Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Gal80 confers specificity on HAT complex interactions with activators.

Michael J Carrozza1, Sam John, Alok Kumar Sil

  • 1Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.

The Journal of Biological Chemistry
|May 3, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chromatin dynamics and cellular energy homeostasis.

Journal of biochemistry·2026
Same author

Context-dependent interplay of Swi-Snf and Tup1-Cyc8 influences chromatin and transcription at antagonistically regulated genes.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Author Correction: The SESAME complex regulates cell senescence through the generation of acetyl-CoA.

Nature metabolism·2026
Same author

Ethanol stress-induced vacuole unlobing is mediated via downregulation of phosphatidylinositol-3,5-bisphosphate and Atg18 phospho-regulation.

European journal of cell biology·2026
Same author

Integrative Structural Modeling of Intrinsically Disordered Regions in a Human HDAC2 Chromatin Remodeling Complex.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Multicomplex Integrative Structural Modeling of a Human Histone Deacetylase Interactome.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Isotope-Edited ESEEM: A New Method for Probing Copper Binding Sites in Neurodegenerative Proteins.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2026
Same journal

Introduction to the Thematic Review Series on Intracellular Protein Degradation. The ubiquitous biology of intracellular protein degradation: a tribute to Alfred L. ("Fred") Goldberg.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2026
Same journal

Correction: Aromatic residue-rich amino-terminal segments of temporin L self-assemble into collagen-mimetic peptides with cell-adhesion properties.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2026
Same journal

YhbO is a DJ-1 family glyoxalase and α-oxoaldehyde hydratase that confers resistance to reactive carbonyl stress (112).

The Journal of biological chemistry·2026
Same journal

ARMH3 acts as a central scaffold at the Golgi/TGN through interactions with Arl5, GBF1, and PI4KB.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2026
Same journal

PAX8 controls proximal tubule epithelial identity and stress response through epigenetic modification of distal regulatory elements.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2026
See all related articles

This study explores how the protein Gal80 controls gene expression by selectively blocking the interaction between specific transcription activators and histone acetyltransferase complexes in yeast. The findings reveal that Gal80 acts as a gatekeeper, ensuring that these complexes are only recruited to the correct locations within the genome.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular biology focusing on Gal80 regulatory mechanisms
  • Chromatin biology and gene expression regulation

Background:

Transcription activators often recruit histone acetyltransferase complexes to specific genomic regions to initiate gene expression. However, the mechanisms preventing these activators from binding indiscriminately to various complexes remain poorly understood. Prior research has shown that many activators exhibit promiscuous binding behaviors toward these regulatory complexes. That uncertainty drove the investigation into how cells maintain precise control over these molecular interactions. No prior work had resolved how specific cofactors might impose order on these otherwise broad binding events. This gap motivated the current examination of regulatory proteins that may govern these processes. Scientists have long sought to understand how signaling pathways influence the recruitment of transcriptional machinery. The present study addresses this by focusing on the role of negative regulators in modulating activator-complex associations.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study is to elucidate how the negative regulator Gal80 imposes specificity on the interactions between transcription activators and histone acetyltransferase complexes. Researchers sought to understand how cells prevent the promiscuous recruitment of these complexes to promoters. The motivation stems from the observation that multiple activators can interact with the same regulatory machinery. This creates a potential for inappropriate gene expression if these interactions are not strictly controlled. The study investigates whether cofactors temporally regulate these associations in response to signaling pathways. By examining the interplay between Gal80, Gal4, and Gcn4, the authors address the mechanisms of selective transcriptional control. The work clarifies how the functional output of activation domains is modulated by specific protein partners. This investigation provides a framework for understanding the precision of gene regulation within the complex environment of the cell.

Keywords:
Gene RegulationYeast GeneticsChromatin RemodelingProtein Interactions

Frequently Asked Questions

The researchers propose that Gal80 selectively inhibits the binding of SAGA and NuA4 complexes to the Gal4 activator. This mechanism prevents the recruitment of these histone acetyltransferase complexes to promoters, whereas the Gcn4 activator remains unaffected by the presence of this negative regulator.

The study utilizes the SAGA and NuA4 histone acetyltransferase complexes as key components. These complexes are responsible for modifying chromatin structure, and their recruitment is modulated by the presence or absence of the Gal80 protein during the activation process.

The researchers indicate that the Gal4 activator is necessary for the recruitment of SAGA to a promoter within a nucleosome array. Gal80 is required to displace SAGA from this site, demonstrating its role in preventing inappropriate activator-mediated targeting.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The researchers employed biochemical binding assays to evaluate the interaction between transcription activators and histone acetyltransferase complexes. They utilized purified protein components to assess the inhibitory capacity of the negative regulator. The team performed experiments using a nucleosome array to simulate the chromatin environment found within cells. This approach allowed for the direct observation of how regulatory proteins influence the recruitment of transcriptional machinery. The investigators compared the effects of the regulator on two distinct activators to determine the specificity of the observed inhibition. They monitored the displacement of complexes from promoters to quantify the functional impact of the regulator. This methodology provided a controlled environment to test the hypothesis regarding selective protein-protein interactions. The experimental design ensured that the observed effects were attributable to the specific regulatory protein being studied.

Main Results:

The primary finding indicates that Gal80 effectively blocks the interaction between the SAGA and NuA4 complexes and the Gal4 activator. This inhibition is highly specific, as the regulator does not interfere with the binding of these same complexes to the Gcn4 activator. The study demonstrates that Gal80 prevents the targeting of SAGA by Gal4 to promoters within a nucleosome array. Furthermore, the regulator successfully displaces SAGA that has already been recruited by Gal4 to these sites. In contrast, the targeting of SAGA by Gcn4 remains entirely unaffected by the presence of Gal80. These results confirm that the regulator acts as a selective gatekeeper for transcriptional machinery recruitment. The data show that the specificity of these interactions is dictated by the presence of cofactors. This mechanism ensures that transcriptional activation is tightly controlled in response to cellular signaling pathways.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that Gal80 functions as a selective barrier to ensure precise transcriptional activation. This protein prevents the recruitment of histone acetyltransferase complexes specifically by the Gal4 activator. The researchers suggest that such cofactors are essential for maintaining specificity within complex signaling networks. These findings imply that the regulatory landscape is far more nuanced than previously assumed. The data indicate that Gal80 does not interfere with the Gcn4 activator, highlighting the selective nature of this inhibition. This work provides a model for how cellular signals can dictate the functional output of transcriptional machinery. The study confirms that cofactors modulate activation domain activity to prevent inappropriate gene expression. These insights clarify how organisms achieve accurate responses to environmental changes through controlled protein-protein interactions.

The team employs a nucleosome array as a model for chromatin structure. This experimental setup allows for the observation of how activators and cofactors interact with DNA-bound proteins, providing a realistic context for studying transcriptional regulation in a controlled environment.

The researchers measure the interaction between activators and histone acetyltransferase complexes through binding assays. They observe that Gal80 effectively blocks Gal4-mediated targeting, while Gcn4-mediated targeting remains stable, confirming the specificity of the regulatory effect.

The authors suggest that cofactors like Gal80 dictate the specificity of activator-complex interactions in response to cellular signals. This implies that the cell uses these proteins to fine-tune gene expression and ensure that transcriptional machinery is only deployed when required.