Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Head-centred motion perception in the ageing visual system.

Tom C A Freeman1, Jenny J Naji, Tom H Margrain

  • 1School of Psychology, Cardiff University, UK. freemant@cardiff.ac.uk

Spatial Vision
|May 7, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On manipulating motion gain in immersive virtual environments: An unidentified source of external noise and a new psychometric function.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

A model of audio-visual motion integration during active self-movement.

Journal of vision·2025
Same author

The precision of signals encoding active self-movement.

Journal of neurophysiology·2024
Same author

The pinna enhances angular discrimination in the frontal hemifield.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2022
Same author

Perceived speed at low luminance: Lights out for the Bayesian observer?

Vision research·2022
Same author

Ability of Head-Mounted Display Technology to Improve Mobility in People With Low Vision: A Systematic Review.

Translational vision science & technology·2020
Same journal

Comment on 'angle illusion on a picture's surface' by Hammad et al. (2008).

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Feature-based attentional modulation increases with stimulus separation in divided-attention tasks.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Spatial distance between target and irrelevant patch modulates detection in a texture segmentation task.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Inhibition related impairments of coherent motion perception in the attention-induced motion blindness paradigm.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Recognition units in reading: backward masking experiments.

Spatial vision·2009
Same journal

Spatial-temporal modeling of interactive image interpretation.

Spatial vision·2009
See all related articles

Age and display duration influence motion perception illusions like the Filehne illusion, but not the Aubert-Fleischl phenomenon. This suggests complex age-related changes in visual processing beyond simple signal size.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Perception
  • Vision Science

Background:

  • The Filehne illusion and Aubert-Fleischl phenomenon demonstrate how eye movements influence motion perception.
  • These illusions suggest that extra-retinal eye-velocity signals modulate perceived speed.
  • Previous research indicates age and display duration affect the Filehne illusion, hinting at developmental changes in visual processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of observer age and display duration on the Filehne illusion and Aubert-Fleischl phenomenon.
  • To test the hypothesis that age-related changes in visual system signal size underlie these perceptual phenomena.
  • To explore the complex interplay between age, duration, and head-centered motion perception.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of the Filehne illusion and Aubert-Fleischl phenomenon in young and old observers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Manipulation of display durations (short and long) to assess temporal effects.
  • Analysis of perceptual data in relation to observer age and display duration.

    • Main Results:

    • Filehne illusion data showed trends consistent with previous findings regarding age and duration.
    • No significant effect of age or display duration was observed for the Aubert-Fleischl phenomenon.
    • Observed differences between the two illusions could not be explained by variations in actual eye movements.

    Conclusions:

    • The signal-size hypothesis does not fully explain the combined effects of age and duration on motion perception.
    • Motion perception, particularly the Filehne illusion, exhibits complex age-dependent modulation.
    • A more intricate model is required to account for the observed age and duration influences on head-centered motion perception.