Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Problems in grading soft tissue sarcomas.

F M Brown1, C D Fletcher

  • 1Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

American Journal of Clinical Pathology
|May 9, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Unique case of a <i>GLI1</i> amplified biphasic mesenchymal tumor of the orbit.

Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2023
Same author

Association of pre-pregnancy BMI and postpartum weight retention with postpartum HbA1c among women with Type 1 diabetes.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2014
Same author

A derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts survival in patients with cancer.

British journal of cancer·2012
Same author

A velopharyngeal exercise.

The Journal of speech disorders·2010
Same author

Discovery of molecular subtypes in leiomyosarcoma through integrative molecular profiling.

Oncogene·2009
Same author

Salmonellosis in cats in the United Kingdom: 1955 to 2007.

The Veterinary record·2009
Same journal

Invasive urothelial carcinoma in association with surface low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma: clinical and pathologic insights from a rare entity.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

CEACAM1 expression by immunohistochemistry in B-cell lymphomas and plasma cell myeloma.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive multicriteria life cycle assessment of biopsy processing in a surgical pathology department.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Prognostic significance of Myb protein and its downstream target genes in lacrimal gland adenoid cystic carcinoma.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Mismatch repair protein "nonclassic expression loss" pattern in colorectal cancer: an important staining pattern that is not well understood.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
Same journal

Musculoskeletal pain in medical laboratory personnel: a cross-sectional study.

American journal of clinical pathology·2026
See all related articles

Histologic grading is crucial for soft tissue sarcoma treatment decisions, but current systems lack consensus and have limitations. Objective measures have not surpassed subjective morphologic grading, and preoperative therapy effects remain unaddressed.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pathology
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • Histologic grading is vital for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treatment decisions.
  • Multiple grading systems exist, but a consensus on the optimal approach is lacking.
  • Current systems, including widely used ones, have acknowledged limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the limitations and challenges associated with histologic grading of soft tissue sarcomas.
  • To highlight the lack of consensus on the best grading system for STS.
  • To discuss the impact of subjectivity and unaddressed factors like preoperative therapy on grading accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and critical analysis of existing STS grading systems.
  • Evaluation of parameters used in common grading schemes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of objective measures and their impact on grading.

    • Main Results:

    • No consensus exists on the best histologic grading system for STS.
    • Widely applied systems (e.g., French National Cancer Centers, National Cancer Institute) have limitations.
    • Subjectivity in parameter assessment and the influence of preoperative therapy complicate grading.

    Conclusions:

    • Current histologic grading systems for STS are suboptimal due to lack of consensus and inherent limitations.
    • Objective measures have not improved upon experienced morphologic grading.
    • Further research is needed to address the impact of preoperative therapy and develop more reliable grading methods for STS.