Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Zero loss peak deconvolution for bandgap EEL spectra.

B Rafferty1, S J Pennycook, L M Brown

  • 1Solid State Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN 37831-6030, USA. dr.rafferty@physics.org

Journal of Electron Microscopy
|May 15, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A local-authority specific definition of research: Results from a Delphi study.

Public health in practice (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Evidence for the Collective Nature of Radial Flow in Pb+Pb Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Evidence for the Dimuon Decay of the Higgs Boson in pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Evidence for Longitudinally Polarized W Bosons in the Electroweak Production of Same-Sign W Boson Pairs in Association with Two Jets in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Observation of tt[over ¯] Production in Pb+Pb Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Search for Dark Matter Produced in Association with a Dark Higgs Boson in the bb[over ¯] Final State Using pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

Physical review letters·2025
Same journal

Visualization of yeast cells by electron microscopy.

Journal of electron microscopy·2012
Same journal

A method for efficient observation of intracellular membranes of monolayer culture cells by quick-freeze and freeze-fracture electron microscopy.

Journal of electron microscopy·2012
Same journal

Small-angle electron scattering from magnetic artificial lattice.

Journal of electron microscopy·2012
Same journal

Multislice simulation of transmission electron microscopy imaging of helium bubbles in Fe.

Journal of electron microscopy·2012
Same journal

Leaf surface characterization of the Tabu-No-Ki tree Machilus thunbergii using electron microscopy and white light scanning interferometry.

Journal of electron microscopy·2012
Same journal

Prokaryote or eukaryote? A unique microorganism from the deep sea.

Journal of electron microscopy·2012
See all related articles

This study compares deconvolution and subtraction methods for processing electron energy loss (EEL) spectra. Deconvolution is shown to be a more reliable method for accurately determining bandgap energies and densities of states.

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Spectroscopy
  • Solid-State Physics

Background:

  • Electron energy loss (EEL) spectroscopy is crucial for material analysis.
  • Accurate bandgap determination requires careful processing of EEL spectra.
  • The zero loss peak (ZLP) in EEL spectra can complicate analysis due to its width and tail.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare deconvolution and subtraction methods for EEL spectra processing.
  • To evaluate the reliability and accuracy of each method in determining bandgap energies.
  • To identify the optimal method for removing ZLP effects in EEL analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of bandgap EEL spectra processing techniques.
  • Comparison of deconvolution and subtraction methods.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Investigation of zero loss peak (ZLP) characteristics and experimental influences.

    • Main Results:

    • Deconvolution method proves significantly more reliable than subtraction.
    • Deconvolution minimizes user interpretation and spectral artifacts.
    • Accurate bandgap energies and densities of states are achievable with deconvolution.

    Conclusions:

    • The deconvolution method is superior for accurate bandgap EEL spectral analysis.
    • Deconvolution effectively removes zero loss peak artifacts.
    • Reliable determination of electronic structure properties is enabled by deconvolution.