Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Challenges encountered in measuring outcome for a rural psychiatric residential program
C L Arfken1, J G Wilson, A M Hegedus
1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences and Center for Healthcare Effectiveness Research, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48207, USA. carfken@med.wayne.edu
Evaluating psychiatric rehabilitation programs is crucial for policymakers. This study highlights challenges in outcome measurement, particularly follow-up difficulties, impacting the assessment of psychiatric rehabilitation effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Effective outcome measurement is vital for psychiatric rehabilitation program evaluation.
- Psychiatric rehabilitation programs face challenges including outcome heterogeneity and participant follow-up.
- Assessing the effectiveness of psychiatric rehabilitation requires robust data collection methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a rural residential psychiatric rehabilitation program.
- To identify and address challenges in collecting outcome measures for psychiatric rehabilitation.
- To examine the impact of program design modifications on follow-up rates and data quality.
Main Methods:
- Initial evaluation design involved interviews and healthcare utilization verification.
- Modified design aimed to improve follow-up rates at the expense of outcome detail.
- Data analysis focused on outcomes for residents with planned discharge.
Main Results:
- A high, albeit biased, follow-up rate was achieved after design modification.
- Residents with planned discharge demonstrated positive outcomes in living situation, employment, healthcare use, and symptom severity.
- High medication compliance indicated successful resident involvement in decision-making.
Conclusions:
- Heterogeneity of outcomes and follow-up difficulties pose significant challenges to evaluating psychiatric rehabilitation.
- Program modifications can improve follow-up but may affect outcome data richness.
- Despite challenges, the study demonstrated positive outcomes for residents completing the program, underscoring the value of psychiatric rehabilitation.
Related Concept Videos
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Psychosis: Goals of Pharmacotherapy
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...

