Related Experiment Videos
Short-term fluoride release from various aesthetic restorative materials
Adrian U J Yap1, S Y Tham, L Y Zhu
1Department of Restorative Dentistry, National University of Singapore. rsdyapuj@nus.edu.sg
Operative Dentistry
|May 23, 2002
Summary
Glass ionomer cements show an initial fluoride burst, unlike giomers and compomers. While glass ionomers release more fluoride initially, giomers show higher release at seven days but less by day 28.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Biomaterials
- Fluoride Release Studies
Background:
- Dental restorative materials, including glass ionomers, compomers, and giomers, are utilized for their therapeutic properties, such as fluoride release.
- Understanding the short-term fluoride release kinetics of these materials is crucial for assessing their clinical efficacy and potential for caries prevention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the short-term fluoride release profiles of a giomer (Reactmer), a compomer (Dyract AP), a conventional glass ionomer cement (Fuji II Cap), and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji II LC).
Main Methods:
- Specimen discs of each material were prepared and immersed in deionized water for 28 days at 37°C.
- Fluoride release was quantified using capillary electrophoresis with field-amplified sample injection (FASI) at various time intervals.
- Statistical analysis was performed using factorial ANOVA with Scheffe's post-hoc test.
Main Results:
- Conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements exhibited an initial fluoride "burst" effect, which was not observed with the compomer or giomer.
- Fluoride release at day one was significantly higher for glass ionomers compared to compomers and giomers.
- Giomers demonstrated significantly higher fluoride release at day seven compared to other materials, but this trend reversed by day 28, with significantly lower release.
Conclusions:
- The initial fluoride release behavior differs significantly among giomers, compomers, and glass ionomers.
- Glass ionomers provide a substantial initial fluoride release, while giomers and compomers offer a more sustained, less intense release pattern in the short term.
- The choice of material impacts fluoride release kinetics, with implications for clinical application and caries management strategies.