Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Working memory and stroop interference: an individual differences investigation.

Debra L Long1, Chantel S Prat

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis 95616, USA. dllong@ucdavis.edu

Memory & Cognition
|May 31, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Default mode network connectivity predicts individual differences in long-term forgetting: Evidence for storage degradation, not retrieval failure.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

One Size Does Not Fit All: Idiographic Computational Models Reveal Individual Differences in Learning and Meta-Learning Strategies.

Topics in cognitive science·2024
Same author

Computer programmers show distinct, expertise-dependent brain responses to violations in form and meaning when reading code.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Investigating local and global control mechanisms in bilingual grammatical processing.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2023
Same author

Bilingual Language Experience Shapes Resting-State Brain Rhythms.

Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)·2023
Same author

Getting language right: Relating individual differences in right hemisphere contributions to language learning and relearning.

Brain and language·2023
Same journal

Music enhances associative generalization: Evidence from a memory integration task.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Video, text, and memory: An emotional verbal overshadowing effect.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

High-working memory capacity individuals can minimize Stroop interference by adapting their strategy based on trial frequency. Low-capacity individuals consistently show interference, regardless of trial type.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Individual differences in working memory capacity are linked to cognitive control.
  • The ability to inhibit irrelevant information is a key aspect of working memory.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine if working memory capacity differences relate to inhibiting irrelevant information.
  • To investigate susceptibility to interference on the Stroop task and strategy use in high-capacity individuals.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Assessed Stroop interference in high- and low-capacity individuals across varying frequencies of conflict trials.
  • Experiment 2: Measured negative priming effects in high-capacity individuals.

Main Results:

  • High-capacity individuals showed reduced Stroop interference when conflict trials were frequent, unlike low-capacity individuals who showed consistent interference.

Related Experiment Videos

  • High-capacity individuals exhibited significant negative priming, indicating slower responses after interference.

    • Conclusions:

    • High-capacity individuals can strategically manage interference, particularly by adapting to trial frequency.
    • Findings support both inhibitory and non-inhibitory explanations for cognitive control and working memory capacity.