Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spatial memory by blind and sighted children.

S Millar

    British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953)
    |November 1, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Blind and sighted children’s spatial recall differs based on sensory modality. Visual processing in sighted children and haptic processing in blind children impacts recall efficiency differently, with age playing a minor role.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Can facial proportions provide an objective assessment of prominent Ears? A survey of healthcare professionals.

    Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2019
    Same author

    Primary cutaneous osteosarcoma: a lesion arising de novo in the posterior triangle of the neck.

    Pathology·2018
    Same author

    Oxymyoglobin formation in meat and poultry.

    Meat science·2011
    Same author

    Dural ectasia: a likely cause of inadequate spinal anaesthesia in two parturients with Marfan's syndrome.

    British journal of anaesthesia·2005
    Same author

    A critical pathway for electronic medical record selection.

    Proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2002
    Same author

    Illusions in reading maps by touch: reducing distance errors.

    British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2002
    Same journal

    Big size with big heart: The effect of body size cue on perceived forgivingness.

    British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
    Same journal

    Time poverty increases self-dehumanization through undermining belief in free will.

    British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
    Same journal

    Temporal dynamics of induced mood and its relationship with modality and individual trait.

    British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
    Same journal

    Less is more when time is scarce: How time poverty enhances minimalistic consumption through increased need for order.

    British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
    Same journal

    Time poverty and access-based consumption: Convenience gains and risk blindness.

    British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
    Same journal

    Contextual cues do not facilitate spontaneous face recognition.

    British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Developmental Psychology
    • Neuroscience

    Background:

    • Spatial memory is crucial for navigation and learning.
    • Understanding how sensory modalities (vision vs. touch) influence spatial recall is important for educational and assistive technologies.
    • Previous research suggests differences in processing, but the interplay with age and specific recall strategies requires further investigation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate non-verbal spatial recall in blind and sighted children across different age groups.
    • To examine how sensory modality (haptic vs. visual) affects spatial memory processing and efficiency.
    • To determine the influence of cueing, recall type, and stimulus position on spatial recall performance.

    Main Methods:

    • A within-subject design was employed to test non-verbal recall of haptically presented spatial positions.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants included three age groups of both blind and sighted children.
  • Conditions varied cueing, recall type, and stimulus position.

    • Main Results:

    • Sighted status significantly impacted spatial recall, interacting with recall type and stimulus position, suggesting distinct processing strategies (quasi-simultaneous visual vs. sequential haptic).
    • Age was significant, with older children utilizing verbal strategies in pre-cued conditions, irrespective of sightedness.
    • The findings support modality-specific effects on spatial recall efficiency but do not support differential age-related effects.

    Conclusions:

    • Visual and haptic modalities demonstrably affect spatial recall processing and efficiency differently.
    • Age does not appear to differentially relate to the modality effects in spatial recall.
    • Cue utilization and verbal strategies contribute to spatial recall improvements but are relatively minor factors.