Genomic plasticity, energy allocations, and the extended longevity phenotypes of Drosophila

The antagonistic pleiotropy theory of the evolution of aging is shown to be too simple to fully apply to the situation in which Drosophila are selected directly for delayed female fecundity and indirectly for extended longevity. We re-evaluated our own previously reported selection experiments using previously unreported data, as well as new data from the literature. The facts that led to this re-evaluation were: (1) the recognition that there are at least three different extended longevity phenotypes; (2) the existence of metabolic and mitochondrial differences between normal- and long-lived organisms; and most importantly; (3) the observation that animals selected for extended longevity are both more fecund and longer-lived than their progenitor control animals. This latter observation appears to contradict the theory. A revised interpretation of the events underlying the selection process indicates that there is a two-step change in energy allocations leading to a complex phenotype. Initial selection first allows the up-regulation of the antioxidant defense system genes and a shift to the use of the pentose shunt. This is later followed by alterations in mitochondrial fatty acid composition and other changes necessary to reduce the leakage of H(2)O(2) from the mitochondria into the cytosol. The recaptured energy available from the latter step is diverted from somatic maintenance back into reproduction, resulting in animals that are both long-lived and fecund. Literature review suggests the involvement of mitochondrial and antioxidant changes are likely universal in the Type 1 extended longevity phenotype.