Related Experiment Videos
Proximity attitudes toward objects and people: reference to a category and a self-representation?
James B Worthen1, Richard P McGlynn, Linda Y Solis
1Department of Psychology, Southeastern Louisiana University, SLU Box 10831, Hammond, LA 70402, USA. jworthen@selu.edu
Summary
Similarity to self, not category typicality, is the stronger predictor of social distance attitudes towards people and objects. Ingroup favoritism was observed for people but not for associated objects.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Attitude Formation
- Intergroup Relations
Background:
- Understanding social distance and proximity attitudes is crucial for intergroup relations.
- Previous research has explored factors influencing attitudes, including group membership and perceived similarity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the predictive strength of similarity to self and category typicality on proximity attitudes.
- To examine these predictors for both people and objects associated with varying races.
Main Methods:
- Quantitative analysis comparing the predictive power of two key variables: similarity to self and category typicality.
- Assessment of attitudes towards people and associated objects across different racial groups.
Main Results:
- Both similarity to self and category typicality significantly predicted proximity attitudes for people and objects.
- Similarity to self emerged as a stronger predictor overall.
- Similarity to self was more predictive for object judgments, while category typicality was more predictive for person judgments.
- Ingroup favoritism was evident in attitudes toward people but not towards associated objects.
Conclusions:
- Similarity to self plays a more dominant role than category typicality in shaping proximity attitudes.
- Attitudes towards outgroup-associated objects may be less influenced by ingroup bias compared to attitudes towards outgroup individuals.
- The predictability of the target influences the formation of proximity attitudes.