[The future of pathology--from the viewpoint of clinical pathology]

Pathology is one of the fundamental diagnostic fields of medicine, its position has changed and will undergo transformation in the 21st century due to the introduction of new methods. Theoretically, pathology was based upon 3 pillars: 1. the autopsies, 2. the surgical pathology, i.e. the processing and evaluation of different biopsies and surgically resected specimens and 3. the cytological investigations. The autopsy was the dominant field till the end of the seventies of the 20th century but about the turn of the 20th and 21st century the cytology, first of all the fine needle aspiration cytology took over the leading role in the pathologic diagnostic activity. This displacement resulted in such a high decrease in the number of autopsies that it is impossible to conclude appreciable epidemiological statements. Meanwhile the role and position of the pathologist has changed also substantially. Previously he was regarded often as a prosecuting attorney. At present time this opinion is transformed into clinical pathologist. Errors in the histopathological diagnosis and reporting can occur in the surgical pathology but its number is not high. To detect and to avoid them is attainable by composition of an adequate audit-system. The number of the new investigatory methods is increasing nowadays wide-spreadingly in the medicine and so in the pathology too. The immunocytochemistry is regarded already as a conventional method but the PCR and FISH-technique are applied also on a large scale. At the same time, new tools such as the cDNA microarray technology, the micro-chip based analytical chemistry, the laser capture microdissection and the wireless medical information appear also in the pathology. The modern information technology is impacted more intensively into the day-to-day pathological work. This method enables to develop worldwide communicating systems which can make perfect the diagnostic work. The pathologist has traditionally functioned as a medical consultant to the clinician. The predominant function of the pathologist has to be evolved from that of medical consultant to that of information specialist.