Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

New technologies in spine: nucleus replacement.

Qi-Bin Bao1, Hansen A Yuan

  • 1Disc Dynamics, Inc., Minnetonka, Minnesota and; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA. cbao@discdyn.com

Spine
|June 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Future of Endoscopic Spine Surgery in the United States: Lifeline or Liability?

International journal of spine surgery·2026
Same author

ISASS Brave New Continuing Medical Education World: The Stifling of Innovation in Spine Surgery Through Overrestriction of Collaboration.

International journal of spine surgery·2026
Same author

Synergizing Digital and Print: Leveraging Spine Surgeons' Social Media to Transform Publishing and Society Interaction.

International journal of spine surgery·2025
Same author

Regenerative and Wellness Medicine: A Boon or Barrier to Surgical Innovation in Degenerative Spine Care?

International journal of spine surgery·2025
Same author

Bringing Back Theorizing Medical Hypotheses to Spine Surgery Research in an Age of Overreliance on Randomized Controlled Trials.

International journal of spine surgery·2025
Same author

Surgeon Skill Level, Experience, and Impact on Patient Outcomes: Rethinking Research Paradigms in Spine Surgery.

International journal of spine surgery·2025
Same journal

To the Editor "Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Statin Usage Are Associated With Rates of Pseudarthrosis Following Single-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion" by Lavu et al.

Spine·2026
Same journal

Sarcopenia Increases Adjacent Segment Degeneration Risk within 3 Years of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Spine·2026
Same journal

Two-Year Cervical Alignment Trajectories and Associated Radiographic Factors after Posterior Spinal Fusion for Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Spine·2026
Same journal

Association of C7 Laminoplasty and Decompression Construct Length With Postoperative Axial Symptoms After Cervical Expansive Unilateral Open-door Laminoplasty.

Spine·2026
Same journal

Functional Assessment of Dysphagia and Dysphonia Following C3-C4 Anterior Spine Surgery: A Prospective Comparison Between Simplified Retropharyngeal and Anterolateral Approaches.

Spine·2026
Same journal

Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Bone Growth Stimulation Improves Union Outcomes in Type II Odontoid Fractures: Insights from a Multicenter Propensity-Matched Pilot Study.

Spine·2026
See all related articles

Nucleus replacement surgery offers advantages over other procedures. Preclinical evaluations are essential for nucleus prostheses, considering benefit-to-risk and benefit-to-cost ratios for patient selection.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Medical Device Engineering

Background:

  • Nucleus replacement is an emerging surgical option.
  • Existing surgical methods for nucleus replacement have limitations.
  • Advancements in prosthetics offer potential benefits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the benefits of nucleus replacement.
  • To detail the design criteria for nucleus prostheses.
  • To describe necessary preclinical evaluations.

Main Methods:

  • Review of nucleus replacement techniques.
  • Analysis of design criteria for nucleus prostheses (preformed and in situ).
  • Evaluation of preclinical testing requirements (biomechanical, biocompatibility, surgical technique).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Nucleus replacement provides distinct advantages.
  • Successful prostheses require adherence to specific design criteria.
  • Comprehensive preclinical evaluation is critical for device safety and efficacy.

Conclusions:

  • Nucleus replacement is a promising surgical approach.
  • Careful consideration of design and rigorous preclinical testing are paramount.
  • Indications and contraindications depend on benefit-risk and benefit-cost analyses.