Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Post-cremation taphonomy and artifact preservation.

Michael W Warren1, John J Schultz

  • 1Department of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611, USA.

Journal of Forensic Sciences
|June 8, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Combining morphological traits and measurements of the skull for osteological sex estimation using random forest modeling.

Journal of forensic sciences·2025
Same author

Decision trees for combining morphological traits and measurements of the skull for osteological sex estimation.

Journal of forensic sciences·2025
Same author

Decision trees for estimating osteological sex from the skull using an expanded suite of morphological traits.

Journal of forensic sciences·2025
Same author

The application of decision trees for estimating osteological sex from common measurements of the skull.

Journal of forensic sciences·2025
Same author

Microscopic analysis of cut mark characteristics from chopping/hacking tools.

Forensic science international·2024
Same author

Sex estimation research trends in forensic anthropology between 2000 and 2022 in five prominent journals.

Journal of forensic sciences·2024
Same journal

GenoEye: A machine learning-based framework for the prediction of intermediate eye color phenotypes.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Sharp force trauma analysis without animal bones: A proposal for sustainable and ethical bone proxies.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Absolute dating of modern paper using <sup>14</sup>C bomb peak data of the paper fibers.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Forensic timeline investigation of Apple Health app on iOS.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Help v. harm: How a "lookup table" for evaluating DNA evidence given activity-level propositions could lead to wrongful convictions.

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Development and Evaluation of an Iodoplatinate-Based Strip-Type Kit for On-Site Drug Screening in Beverages".

Journal of forensic sciences·2026
See all related articles

Commercial cremation significantly alters human bone, making non-osseous artifacts crucial for forensic analysis. New cremation processing methods impact bone fragmentation and artifact preservation, affecting identification in forensic investigations.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Anthropology
  • Taphonomy
  • Bioarchaeology

Background:

  • Commercial cremation is an extreme postmortem process altering human bone.
  • Cremated remains often lack diagnostic biological evidence due to fragmentation.
  • Non-osseous artifacts are vital for identifying origin, decedent, and commingling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the impact of modern cremation processing on forensic analysis.
  • To evaluate how new cremation technologies affect bone and artifact preservation.
  • To understand the implications for identifying cremated human remains.

Main Methods:

  • Examination of cremated human remains processed with various equipment.
  • Analysis of bone fragmentation patterns and artifact preservation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of results from traditional versus newest cremation processing techniques.

    • Main Results:

    • Newer cremation processors cause significant changes in bone modification.
    • The degree of bone fragmentation and artifact preservation varies by processor type.
    • Diagnostic bone fragments and artifacts are differentially affected by modern procedures.

    Conclusions:

    • The latest cremation procedures alter postmortem bone modification significantly.
    • Forensic analysis of cremated remains must consider the impact of new processing technologies.
    • Understanding these changes is critical for accurate identification and interpretation of cremated remains.