Related Experiment Videos
Clinical evaluation of the WOMAC 3.0 OA Index in numeric rating scale format using a computerized touch screen
R Theiler1, J Spielberger, H A Bischoff
1Division of Rheumatology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Switzerland. robert.theiler@bluemail.ch
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
|June 12, 2002
Summary
The computerized Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index 3.0 is a reliable tool for assessing osteoarthritis pain, stiffness, and function. This digital format offers immediate results comparable to the traditional paper version.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Medical Informatics
Background:
- The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index is a validated tool for assessing osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip and knee.
- The index measures pain, stiffness, and physical function through a self-administered questionnaire.
- Previous validation was limited to a paper-based format.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the computerized WOMAC 3.0 using a numerical rating scale on a touch screen.
- To assess the feasibility of immediate evaluation and integration of multimedia (cartoons, audio) in the digital format.
- To compare the performance of the computerized WOMAC with its paper-based counterpart.
Main Methods:
- Fifty patients with radiographically confirmed hip or knee OA were enrolled.
- Participants completed both the paper and computerized versions of the WOMAC index.
- Patients were randomized to either the paper or computerized format first to mitigate order effects.
Main Results:
- High intra-class correlation coefficients (0.915 for pain, 0.745 for stiffness, 0.940 for function) indicate strong agreement between versions.
- Spearman correlation coefficients (0.88 for pain, 0.77 for stiffness, 0.87 for function) further support the comparability of the two formats.
- The computerized version demonstrated comparable validity to the paper-based WOMAC across all three domains.
Conclusions:
- The computerized WOMAC OA index 3.0 is a valid and reliable alternative to the paper-based version.
- This digital format provides immediate results, facilitating quicker clinical decision-making.
- The computerized version allows for direct comparison with previous patient assessments, aiding in monitoring disease progression.