Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
Suspects, lies, and videotape: an analysis of authentic high-stake liars
Samantha Mann1, Aldert Vrij, Ray Bull
1Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Hants, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
This study is one of the very few, and the most extensive to date, which has examined deceptive behavior in a real-life, high-stakes setting. The behavior of 16 suspects in their police interviews has been analyzed. Clips of video footage have been selected where other sources (reliable witness statements and forensic evidence) provide evidence that the suspect lied or told the truth. Truthful and deceptive behaviors were compared. The suspects blinked less frequently and made longer pauses during deceptive clips than during truthful clips. Eye contact was maintained equally for deceptive and truthful clips. These findings negate the popular belief amongst both laypersons and professional lie detectors (such as the police) that liars behave nervously by fidgeting and avoiding eye contact. However, large individual differences were present.
Related Concept Videos
Hindsight Biases
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Understanding Deception
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

