Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Outcomes instruments in facial plastic surgery.

Ramsey Alsarraf1

  • 1The Newbury Center, Cosmetic Facial Plastic Surgery, Boston, MA 02116, USA.

Facial Plastic Surgery : FPS
|June 14, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Validated quality of life instruments are crucial for measuring patient outcomes in facial plastic surgery. Their development and use are essential for quantifying subjective results and improving patient satisfaction assessments.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Outcomes Research in Facial Plastic Surgery: A Review and New Directions. An Update.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2020
Same author

Outcomes Research in Facial Plastic Surgery: A Review and New Directions.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2020
Same author

The deep plane facelift.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2003
Same author

Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2002
Same author

Outcomes of facial cosmetic procedures.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2002
Same author

Cosmetic surgery procedures as luxury goods: measuring price and demand in facial plastic surgery.

Archives of facial plastic surgery·2002

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Outcomes Research
  • Health Psychology

Background:

  • Accurate measurement of patient-related outcomes in facial plastic surgery is often subjective.
  • Existing medical fields utilize validated instruments for quantifying patient satisfaction.
  • Facial plastic surgery has lagged in adopting these standardized quality of life (QoL) instruments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the importance of validated, procedure-specific QoL instruments in facial plastic surgery.
  • To provide an understanding of QoL instruments within outcomes research.
  • To review existing validated instruments and suggest future directions.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review on the application of QoL instruments in outcomes research.
  • Discussion of the unique challenges in measuring subjective outcomes in facial plastic surgery.
  • Identification and description of currently validated QoL instruments for facial plastic surgery.

Main Results:

  • Subjective patient-reported outcomes are predominant in facial plastic surgery.
  • Validated QoL instruments are vital for objective assessment of patient satisfaction.
  • Several procedure-specific QoL instruments have been developed and validated.

Conclusions:

  • Standardized QoL instruments are essential for advancing outcomes research in facial plastic surgery.
  • The adoption of these tools will lead to more accurate and reliable assessment of surgical results.
  • Future research should focus on further development and application of these instruments to enhance patient care.

Related Experiment Videos