Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Novel metrics to compare dissolution profiles.

Paul R Seo1, Vinod P Shah, James E Polli

  • 1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, 20 North Pine Street, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

Pharmaceutical Development and Technology
|June 18, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ritonavir release from spherical amorphous solid dispersions: prediction and observation.

International journal of pharmaceutics·2026
Same author

Predicting surfactant effects on drug permeation across hollow fiber membrane.

Journal of pharmaceutical sciences·2026
Same author

Mastering particle size analysis: lessons, challenges, and future directions from the FDA-CRCG workshop.

AAPS open·2026
Same author

Transient pH film model for in vitro powder dissolution of weakly basic drugs into buffer and comparison to conventional film model.

Journal of pharmaceutical sciences·2026
Same author

Reduced-Resistances Model for Enhanced Drug Permeation via a Solubilizing Receiver Medium: A Mechanistic Study with Hollow Fiber Membranes.

Molecular pharmaceutics·2026
Same author

Proceedings of the 2024 FDA-CRCG Workshop: Scientific and Regulatory Considerations for Assessment of Immunogenicity Risk for Generic Peptide and Oligonucleotide Drug Products.

The AAPS journal·2026
Same journal

<i>Camellia sinensis</i> Silver Nanoparticles Inhibit Proliferation and Induce PARP-Dependent Apoptosis in A549 Cells: Formulation, Characterization, and Biological Evaluation.

Pharmaceutical development and technology·2026
Same journal

Enhanced solubility and bioavailability of zanubrutinib nanocrystals: Physicochemical and Pharmacokinetic evaluation.

Pharmaceutical development and technology·2026
Same journal

Intradermal delivery of lidocaine hydrochloride using dissolving microneedles: <i>in vitro</i> dermatokinetic test and <i>in vivo</i> anesthetic activity assessment.

Pharmaceutical development and technology·2026
Same journal

Quality by design-guided development of silica-enabled lipid hybrid nanoparticles for enhanced olaparib dissolution.

Pharmaceutical development and technology·2026
Same journal

Surface engineering of nanocarriers with polymer coatings: materials, strategies, functional outcomes, and clinical translation.

Pharmaceutical development and technology·2026
Same journal

Compression equations in pharmaceutical tableting: from classical compaction models to data-driven and mechanistic approaches.

Pharmaceutical development and technology·2026
See all related articles

Four new metrics (rho, rho m, delta a, delta s) effectively compare dissolution profiles of immediate release metoprolol tartrate tablets, with rho m showing particular promise.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • Drug Product Performance Evaluation
  • Dissolution Testing

Background:

  • Dissolution testing is crucial for assessing drug product performance.
  • Comparing dissolution profiles requires robust statistical metrics.
  • Existing metrics like f2 have limitations in characterizing profile differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate four novel dissolution profile comparison metrics: rho, rho m, delta a, and delta s.
  • To assess the performance characteristics of these novel metrics.
  • To compare their performance against the established f2 metric.

Main Methods:

  • Applied four novel metrics (rho, rho m, delta a, delta s) and f2 to dissolution data.
  • Utilized dissolution data from immediate release metoprolol tartrate tablets (FAST and SLOW profiles).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Calculated mean values, confidence limits, and skewness to characterize metric performance.

    • Main Results:

    • Novel metrics indicated a >50% relative difference between FAST and SLOW metoprolol tartrate profiles.
    • Mean values were: rho (1.80), rho m (0.80), delta a (0.47), delta s (0.36), and f2 (19.6).
    • Favorable metric distribution properties were suggested by skewness values.

    Conclusions:

    • The novel direct curve comparison metrics (rho, rho m, delta a, delta s) are viable for comparing dissolution profiles.
    • rho m demonstrated particular utility among the novel metrics evaluated.
    • These metrics offer a valuable alternative for dissolution profile analysis.