Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The acetabular component: an elliptical monoblock alternative.

Thomas P Sculco1

  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York 10021, USA.

The Journal of Arthroplasty
|June 18, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Regional Differences in Knee Osteoporosis Based on Coronal Alignment Phenotype in Patients Undergoing Preoperative CT Imaging.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Effects of Perioperative Dronabinol Use in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

Anesthesiology·2026
Same author

Sources of Patients' Expectations of Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2025
Same author

Arthrofibrosis Severity in Knees With Failed Total Knee Arthroplasties Differs With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Synovial Classification.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2025
Same author

Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Improves Outcomes in Obese Aseptic Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2025
Same author

Evaluating and Treating Patients With a Recalled Exactech Knee Replacement: A Consensus Approach.

HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery·2024
Same journal

Patient Satisfaction and Outcomes at a Mean 11-Year Follow-Up Following Total Hip Arthroplasty with Subtrochanteric Osteotomy for Dislocated Hips After Schanz Osteotomy.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

Comparative Analysis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Rates After Total Hip Arthroplasty Across Facility Types: A Single Institution Study.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

Preoperative Pneumonia and Its Association With Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Postoperative Complications After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Prior Internal Fixation: A Comparison with Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

The Relationship Between Patient Satisfaction and the Degree of Valgus Deformity in Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at a Mean 3-Year Follow-Up.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same journal

Kneeling After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Resurfacing the Patella Affect the Ability to Kneel?

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
See all related articles

Monoblock acetabular cups reduce wear and osteolysis, a common failure in hip replacements. This study shows excellent short-term results with no mechanical failures in over 2,400 implants.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Osteolysis, caused by biologic reactions to wear debris from polyethylene and metallic components, is a primary failure mode in cemented and noncemented acetabular fixation.
  • Conventional acetabular cups present multiple sites for wear debris generation and potential complications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a monoblock acetabular noncemented component in reducing failure mechanisms associated with acetabular cups.
  • To assess the clinical outcomes and revision rates of elliptical monoblock acetabular cups.

Main Methods:

  • Implantation of over 2,400 elliptical monoblock acetabular cups.
  • Short-term follow-up of 6.5 years, with a subset of 840 hips followed for over 4 years.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Monitoring for mechanical failures, hip instability, infection, and need for screw fixation conversion.

    • Main Results:

    • No mechanical failures requiring revision were reported in the study cohort.
    • Revision for recurrent hip instability occurred in four patients, and one patient required revision for infection.
    • The rate of conversion to screw fixation due to poor press-fit was less than 1%.

    Conclusions:

    • Elliptical monoblock acetabular noncemented components offer advantages in minimizing wear debris and osteolysis.
    • These components demonstrate a low revision rate for mechanical failure and good short-term clinical outcomes.
    • The design eliminates sources of wear, such as locking rings and screw holes, potentially improving long-term implant survival.