Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Combating omission errors through task analysis and good reminders.

J Reason1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. reason@redlane.demon.co.uk

Quality & Safety in Health Care
|June 25, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction?

Ergonomics·2010
Same author

[All memory is in the present. Hans-Gerhard Shäfer (18.12.1951-05.07.1995)].

Der Anaesthesist·2005
Same author

Safety in the operating theatre - Part 2: human error and organisational failure.

Quality & safety in health care·2005
Same author

Beyond the organisational accident: the need for "error wisdom" on the frontline.

Quality & safety in health care·2004
Same author

Human error: models and management.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2000
Same author

Understanding adverse events: human factors.

Quality in health care : QHC·1995
Same journal

Organisational culture: variation across hospitals and connection to patient safety climate.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

The Rhode Island ICU collaborative: a model for reducing central line-associated bloodstream infection and ventilator-associated pneumonia statewide.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

Assessing and improving safety culture throughout an academic medical centre: a prospective cohort study.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

The WHO patient safety curriculum guide for medical schools.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

Preventing ethics conflicts and improving healthcare quality through system redesign.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

Improvement leaders: what do they and should they do? A summary of a review of research.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
See all related articles

Human error often involves omitting necessary task steps. Researchers identified error-prone steps and evaluated memory aids, proposing a three-stage program to prevent omissions in healthcare procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Human Factors Engineering
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Healthcare Safety

Background:

  • Omission errors are the most frequent type of human error in task execution.
  • Specific task characteristics can predict the likelihood of an individual omitting a step.
  • Understanding these characteristics is crucial for developing effective error-prevention strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify characteristics of task steps that commonly lead to omissions.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of everyday memory aids based on specific criteria.
  • To propose a systematic program for managing and preventing task step omissions in safety-critical activities.

Main Methods:

  • Study 1: Analyzed omission errors in a simple photocopier task to identify error-provoking features.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Study 2: Assessed everyday memory aids against five criteria for effective reminders (conspicuity, contiguity, content, context, countability).
  • Development of a three-stage omission management program: task analysis, omission likelihood assessment, and reminder selection/application.
  • Main Results:

    • Failing to remove the last original page from a photocopier was identified as a common omission, linked to four additive error-provoking features.
    • A strong correlation was observed between the usage of memory aids and their adherence to the five defined criteria.
    • The proposed three-stage program provides a structured approach to managing omissions.

    Conclusions:

    • Task steps with specific, identifiable features are more prone to omission.
    • Memory aids are more effective when they possess conspicuity, contiguity, relevant content, context, and countability.
    • A systematic omission management program, including task analysis and appropriate reminders, can enhance safety in healthcare procedures.