Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Graded aspects of morphological processing: task and processing time.

Laurie Beth Feldman1, Brendon Prostko

  • 1University at Albany, SUNY and Haskins Laboratories, 270 Crown St. New Haven, CT 06510 USA. if503@albany.edu

Brain and Language
|June 26, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Emoji use validates the potential for meaning standardization among ideographic symbols.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2023
Same author

Are emojis processed like words?: Eye movements reveal the time course of semantic processing for emojified text.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2021
Same author

The dynamics of negative stereotypes as revealed by tweeting behavior in the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack.

Heliyon·2020
Same author

Emoticons in text may function like gestures in spoken or signed communication.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2018
Same author

If priming is graded rather than all-or-none, can reactivating abstract structures be the underlying mechanism?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2018
Same author

Discrimination in lexical decision.

PloS one·2017
Same journal

Effects of semantic distance and metaphorical constituent position on L2 noun-noun metaphor processing: an ERP study.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Cortical tracking of natural speech by children with developmental language disorder (DLD): An EEG speech decoding investigation.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Inhibitory states modulate the processing of negated concepts in existential sentences. Evidence from ERPs.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

The interplay between attentional control and language task schemas: Progressive adaptation of attentional control in interpreting.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

You again? 14-month-olds show neural signatures of lexical-semantic activation for novel instead of familiar voices.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Five-year-old children engage temporal but not frontal mechanisms during morphosyntactic processing of sentences.

Brain and language·2026
See all related articles

Morphological processing effects were examined using related word primes. Morphological relatedness showed facilitation across tasks and stimulus onset asynchronies, differing from orthographic and semantic effects.

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Investigating how humans process word meaning and form is crucial for understanding language.
  • Distinguishing between different types of word relationships (orthographic, semantic, morphological) offers insights into cognitive mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effects of orthographically (O), semantically (S), and morphologically (M) related primes on word processing.
  • To examine how these effects vary across different tasks and stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs).

Main Methods:

  • Utilized lexical decision, naming, and go/no go naming tasks.
  • Compared reaction times and accuracy for targets preceded by O, S, and M primes.
  • Manipulated stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) ranging from 66 to 300 ms.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Morphological relatedness consistently produced facilitation, with magnitude varying by SOA and task.
  • The impact of semantic and orthographic similarity was also dependent on SOA and task.
  • Crucially, morphological and orthographic effects diverged over time, with morphological effects more closely mirroring semantic processing.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support a graded model of morphological processing.
  • The temporal dynamics of morphological, orthographic, and semantic effects provide a nuanced understanding of word recognition.
  • This research highlights the distinct yet interactive nature of different word processing pathways.