Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Image processing and enhancement provided by commercial dental software programs.

T M Lehmann1, E Troeltsch, K Spitzer

  • 1Institute of Medical Informatics, Aachen University of Technology, Aachen, Germany. lehmann@computer.org

Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology
|June 28, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Severe maternal morbidity in women with high BMI in IVF and unassisted singleton pregnancies.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2018
Same author

Present situation and prospect of medical knowledge based systems in German-speaking countries: results of an online survey.

Methods of information in medicine·2012
Same author

Gastroscopic images with erosions, without ulcer development.

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift·2010
Same author

Treatment of bronchial asthma with coramin.

Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2010
Same author

Secondary axillary lymphatic tuberculosis after caries of the second rib.

Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)·2010
Same author

Observations on the effects of sulfonamide on the gastric mucosa.

Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift·2010
Same journal

Cranial Base Characteristics in Adults with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea and Matched Controls: A Retrospective CBCT Study.

Dento maxillo facial radiology·2026
Same journal

Dual-Circle: a new way of assessing Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc position at coronal MRI.

Dento maxillo facial radiology·2026
Same journal

Quantification of Supracrestal Tissue Attachment Using High-Frequency Ultrasound.

Dento maxillo facial radiology·2026
Same journal

Radiological-pathological correlation of tumour size and depth of invasion of oral squamous cell carcinoma using Dual-Energy CT in comparison to MRI and the impact on T-stage.

Dento maxillo facial radiology·2026
Same journal

SinusNet+: Deep Condition-Label-Free Segmentation of Maxillary Sinus Conditions in CBCT images.

Dento maxillo facial radiology·2026
Same journal

Handheld dental X-ray devices: a scoping review of radiation safety and image quality.

Dento maxillo facial radiology·2026
See all related articles

Commercial dental imaging software offers limited image processing tools, hindering analysis. Standardized terminology and enhanced features are needed for better dental radiology software.

Area of Science:

  • Digital imaging
  • Radiology
  • Image processing

Background:

  • Commercial software for direct digital dental imaging is widely used.
  • Image processing capabilities within this software are crucial for diagnostic accuracy.
  • A lack of standardization in image processing tools complicates software comparison.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and analyze image processing algorithms in commercial dental imaging software.
  • To map these algorithms to a standardized nomenclature.
  • To evaluate the functionality and naming conventions of image processing tools.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated thirteen commercial dental imaging software programs.
  • Utilized a synthesized test image with various features (gray scale ramps, noise).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Classified algorithms for display, point processing, pseudo-coloration, spatial filtering, frequency domain filtering, measurements, and annotations.

    • Main Results:

    • All programs offered basic gray-scale display and measurement tools.
    • Image processing and enhancement features were found to be limited and varied across programs.
    • Inconsistent naming and implementation of functions were observed, with some using terms inappropriately.

    Conclusions:

    • Commercial dental imaging software generally lacks comprehensive image processing and enhancement functions.
    • The arbitrary naming of functions hinders software comparison and evaluation.
    • Standardized terminology and expanded functionality are recommended for dental radiology software.