Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Responsible authorship and peer review.

James R Wilson1

  • 1Department of Industrial Engineering, 2401 Stinson Drive, Riddick Labs 328, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7906, USA. jwilson@eos.ncsu.edu

Science and Engineering Ethics
|July 3, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Validation of MENTOR Tool to Describe Bowel Dysfunction in Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting.

Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Predicting motor recovery in tetraplegia during inpatient rehabilitation by motor unit action potentials and stimulated manual motor testing.

The journal of spinal cord medicine·2025
Same author

Feasibility of gabapentin as an intervention for neurorecovery after an acute spinal cord injury: Protocol.

Frontiers in neurology·2022
Same author

Multi-center, single-blind randomized controlled trial comparing functional electrical stimulation therapy to conventional therapy in incomplete tetraplegia.

Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences·2022
Same author

Improving chemotherapy infusion operations through the simulation of scheduling heuristics: a case study.

Health systems (Basingstoke, England)·2021
Same author

International Standards to document Autonomic Function following SCI (ISAFSCI): Second Edition.

Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation·2021

This article outlines responsible authorship and peer review principles. It emphasizes guidelines for reviewing journal articles and proposals throughout the writing process.

Area of Science:

  • Scientific Publishing Ethics
  • Research Integrity

Background:

  • Responsible authorship and peer review are crucial for scientific integrity.
  • Adherence to established guidelines ensures the quality and validity of published research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To survey the fundamental principles of responsible authorship.
  • To detail guidelines for effective peer review of journal articles and proposals.
  • To underscore the importance of integrating these guidelines across all writing phases.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on authorship and peer review standards.
  • Analysis of best practices for manuscript and proposal evaluation.
  • Emphasis on the practical application of guidelines in academic writing.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Key principles for ethical authorship are identified.
  • Specific recommendations for refereeing journal articles and research proposals are provided.
  • The necessity of consistent application of guidelines from inception to completion of writing is highlighted.

Conclusions:

  • Upholding responsible authorship and rigorous peer review is essential for scientific advancement.
  • Adherence to established guidelines enhances the credibility of scholarly publications.
  • Integrating ethical considerations throughout the writing process ensures high-quality research output.