Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Partitioning and peeling for constructing prognostic groups.

Michael LeBlanc1, Joth Jacobson, John Crowley

  • 1Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, MP-557, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|July 4, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing contribution of effect in oncology combination therapies: lessons learned to inform and optimize future registrational trial designs.

The oncologist·2026
Same author

Risk Prediction Model for Taxane-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Early-Stage Cancer.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Treatment of Follicular Lymphoma With CHOP and Anti-CD20 Therapy: 15-Year Follow-Up of the SWOG S0016 Trial.

JAMA oncology·2026
Same author

PROSPECT-LUNG: A National Clinical Trials Network Trial Advancing Pragmatic Innovation in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer·2026
Same author

Three-Year Follow-Up of Nivolumab-AVD Versus Brentuximab Vedotin-AVD in Adolescents With Advanced-Stage Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma on S1826.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same author

Dementia Care Research and Psychosocial Factors.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same journal

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates between two overlapping populations.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A robust neural network with random effects for subject-specific prediction of clustered count data.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A comparison of methods for designing hybrid type 2 cluster-randomized trials with continuous effectiveness and implementation endpoints.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Joint analysis of longitudinal and recurrent event data: A functional regression approach with autoregressive frailty.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces interpretable methods for patient group identification, focusing on tree-based and novel peeling techniques to define prognosis. These approaches help describe patient groups with poor outcomes, aiding clinical trial data analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Machine Learning in Medicine

Background:

  • Accurate patient prognosis is crucial for effective treatment strategies.
  • Identifying distinct patient subgroups with varying outcomes remains a challenge in clinical research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and detail methods for identifying patient groups with different prognoses.
  • To focus on techniques providing interpretable descriptions of patient groups and their predictor space regions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized tree-based methods for patient group identification.
  • Developed and detailed novel 'peeling' techniques to refine patient groups.
  • Applied simulations and real-world clinical trial data for validation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated the utility of tree-based and peeling methods in defining prognostic groups.
  • Successfully described patient groups with poor outcomes using multiple myeloma clinical trial data.
  • Highlighted the interpretability of the developed methods for clinical application.

Conclusions:

  • Tree-based and peeling methods offer interpretable approaches for prognostic group identification.
  • These methods are valuable for analyzing clinical trial data and understanding patient outcomes.
  • Further development and application of peeling techniques are warranted for improved patient stratification.