Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating medical grand rounds.

Arthur I Rothman1, Gary Sibbald

  • 1Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, UHN S-Wing, Suite 3-805, 190 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4.

The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
|July 9, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Management of Infected Wounds: A Wound Healing Foundation Consensus Statement.

Advances in wound care·2026
Same author

Nutrition and Wound Healing: Eat Well, Live Well.

Advances in skin & wound care·2019
Same author

Measuring epidermal effects of ostomy skin barriers.

Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)·2018
Same author

A Canadian Population-Based Cohort to the Study Cost and Burden of Surgically Resected Hidradenitis Suppurativa.

Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery·2018
Same author

A consensus approach to wound care in epidermolysis bullosa.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·2012
Same author

Defining success in clinical trials of diabetic foot wounds: the Los Angeles DFCon consensus.

International wound journal·2009
Same journal

From Healers to Leaders: A Qualitative Study of Career Paths and Influencing Factors in Chief Physician Roles in Finnish Health Care.

The Journal of continuing education in the health professions·2026
Same journal

The Avatar Advantage: AI-Powered Faculty Development to Enhance Feedback Delivery Skills.

The Journal of continuing education in the health professions·2026
Same journal

Meeting Continuing Education Needs Through Online Learning in Conflict Settings: Insights from Ukraine.

The Journal of continuing education in the health professions·2026
Same journal

Multimodal Pediatric Advance Care Planning Training for Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Palliative Care Practitioners: Training, Self-Efficacy, and Practice.

The Journal of continuing education in the health professions·2026
Same journal

Integration Experiences of International and Canadian Medical Graduates New to Rural Practice.

The Journal of continuing education in the health professions·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Abundance, and the Multi-Layered Competence of Health Professionals.

The Journal of continuing education in the health professions·2026
See all related articles

Standard presenter evaluation forms are valid and reliable for assessing effectiveness in medical grand rounds. A suggested number of evaluations ensures stable presenter effectiveness estimates, aiding in planning decisions.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Performance Evaluation

Background:

  • Standardized presenter evaluation forms have been available since January 2000 for grand rounds in the University of Toronto's Department of Medicine.
  • The 2000-2001 academic year focused on gathering evidence to validate the results from these forms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the integrity and coherence of the presenter evaluation form.
  • To determine the number of evaluations needed for a stable estimate of presenter effectiveness.

Main Methods:

  • The study addressed the internal consistency of the evaluation tool.
  • It also investigated the psychometric properties related to the number of ratings required for reliable assessment.

Main Results:

  • Evidence supporting the integrity and coherence of the evaluation form was found.

Related Experiment Videos

  • A recommended number of evaluations was determined to achieve a stable estimate of presenter effectiveness.

    • Conclusions:

    • Presenter ratings typically fall within a narrow range, necessitating high precision for individual ranking.
    • Group classification based on these evaluations is sufficiently precise for informed planning decisions.