Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 24, 2026

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations
Published on: November 3, 2010
Loss of heterozygosity analysis: practically and conceptually flawed?
Ian P M Tomlinson1, Maryou B K Lambros, Rebecca R Roylance
1Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, 44 Lincoln's Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PX, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
The Knudson "two-hit" hypothesis has provided the rationale for studies that aim to identify tumor-suppressor genes by mapping regions of allelic loss (loss of heterozygosity, LOH). Although LOH has been found in practically all types of tumors, very few such projects have been successful in identifying their tumor-suppressor targets. The prime explanation for this failure is probably that researchers have, in general, been too credulous about the two-hit hypothesis, and too willing to ignore factors such as intratumor heterogeneity, contamination by normal cells, karyotypic complexity, homozygous deletions, gene dosage changes, and polymerase chain reaction artifacts. We suggest ways of minimizing these problems. Unfortunately, there is no guarantee that existing or newer methods, such as genomic microarrays and in situ single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis, will solve the difficulties of LOH analysis. The future prospects for LOH studies are, as ever, uncertain.
Insights
The Knudson "two-hit" hypothesis guides tumor-suppressor gene discovery through loss of heterozygosity (LOH) mapping. However, LOH studies face challenges, limiting their success in identifying critical cancer-related genes.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- The Knudson "two-hit" hypothesis underpins research into tumor-suppressor genes.
- Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) mapping is a key method derived from this hypothesis.
- Despite widespread LOH detection in tumors, identifying specific tumor-suppressor genes remains challenging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the effectiveness of LOH analysis in identifying tumor-suppressor genes.
- To explore the limitations and potential pitfalls of LOH studies.
- To propose strategies for improving LOH analysis and discuss future prospects.
Main Methods:
- Review and analysis of existing LOH studies in cancer research.
- Discussion of confounding factors affecting LOH analysis, including intratumor heterogeneity and technical artifacts.
- Consideration of newer genomic technologies for LOH detection.
Main Results:
- Few LOH studies have successfully identified tumor-suppressor gene targets.
- Numerous factors complicate LOH interpretation, including intratumor heterogeneity, normal cell contamination, karyotypic complexity, homozygous deletions, gene dosage changes, and PCR artifacts.
- Existing and emerging methods may not fully resolve LOH analysis difficulties.
Conclusions:
- The reliance on the "two-hit" hypothesis for LOH studies may be overly simplistic.
- Addressing technical and biological complexities is crucial for advancing LOH analysis.
- The future utility of LOH studies in tumor-suppressor gene discovery remains uncertain.
Related Concept Videos
Hardy-Weinberg Principle
Gene Conversion
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...

