Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bioethical pluralism and complementarity.

Frederick Grinnell1, Jeffrey P Bishop, Laurence B McCullough

  • 1Department of Cell Biology and Ethics in Science and Medicine Program, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75390-9039, USA. frederick.grinnell@utsouthwestern.edu

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
|July 13, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

High school science fair: Characterizing student communication and presentation practices and their association with SEF outcomes.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

High School Science Fair: What Students Say -- Mastery, Performance, and Self-Determination Theory.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

High school science fair: What students say-mastery, performance, and self-determination theory.

PloS one·2025
Same author

The Problematic "Existence" of Digital Twins: Human Intention and Moral Decision.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2024
Same author

Ritual and Power in Medicine: Questioning Honor Walks in Organ Donation.

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2024
Same author

High school science fair: School location trends in student participation and experience.

PloS one·2023
Same journal

"Wouldn't It Be Easier to Be Burned at the Stake?": Schizophrenia and Deinstitutionalization in <i>Bitter Medicine</i>.

Perspectives in biology and medicine·2026
Same journal

The Mental Health Crisis of Rural America: Understanding Supply and Demand.

Perspectives in biology and medicine·2026
Same journal

The Final Act of Care: Accuracy in Cause of Death Statements.

Perspectives in biology and medicine·2026
Same journal

Existential Competence: Redefining Clinical Excellence Beyond Health Optimization.

Perspectives in biology and medicine·2026
Same journal

Making Fun of Medicine: Resisting Medicine's Principalities.

Perspectives in biology and medicine·2026
Same journal

Courage, Conviction, Resolve: The Story of Dr. Gui Xi'en.

Perspectives in biology and medicine·2026
See all related articles

Complementarity offers a new approach to bioethical pluralism, accepting all valid perspectives. This method embraces holistic, dynamic tension instead of seeking singular moral judgments in complex bioethics dilemmas.

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Quantum Physics Applications

Background:

  • Bioethical pluralism traditionally seeks to isolate or choose between competing ethical viewpoints.
  • Existing approaches often struggle to reconcile mutually exclusive yet equally valid ethical perspectives.
  • The concept of complementarity, originating in quantum physics, offers a potential new framework.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and define complementarity as a novel feature of bioethical pluralism.
  • To explore how complementarity can address the challenges of integrating diverse ethical viewpoints.
  • To propose an alternative to conventional methods of resolving ethical conflicts.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of complementarity principle from quantum physics.
Keywords:
Analytical ApproachBioethics and Professional Ethics

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of the complementarity concept to bioethical pluralism.
  • Comparative analysis with traditional approaches to ethical pluralism.

    • Main Results:

    • Complementarity in bioethics involves accepting mutually exclusive perspectives that highlight equally important aspects of a situation.
    • This approach avoids the need to isolate or choose between differing viewpoints.
    • It fosters a state of holistic, dynamic tension rather than aiming for final moral judgments.

    Conclusions:

    • Complementarity provides a robust framework for navigating complex bioethical pluralism.
    • Accepting all valid perspectives leads to a more nuanced and dynamic ethical understanding.
    • This model shifts the focus from singular judgments to embracing multifaceted ethical considerations.