High school science fair: What students say-mastery, performance, and self-determination theory
Frederick Grinnell1, Simon Dalley2, Joan Reisch3
1Department of Cell Biology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Science and Engineering Fairs (SEFs) boost student interest by offering learning experiences and career insights. Positive engagement is linked to scientist mentorship, while school-only fairs may yield less enthusiasm.
Area of Science:
- Educational Psychology
- Science Education
Background:
- Science and Engineering Fairs (SEFs) are widely reported to increase high school students' interest in Science and Engineering (S&E).
- The specific factors driving student engagement and interest in SEFs remain underexplored.
- Understanding these factors is crucial for developing effective strategies to enhance student participation and outcomes in SEFs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the reasons behind increased or decreased student interest in S&E due to SEF participation.
- To analyze qualitative feedback from students regarding their experiences in SEFs.
- To identify best practices for SEFs to maximize positive impact on student interest and outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A national survey was conducted with 1191 students participating in SEFs during the 2021-22 and 2022-23 academic years.
- A free-text 'Reason Why?' question was included to gather qualitative data on students' motivations and perceptions.
- Analysis focused on categorizing and quantifying positive and negative comments related to SEF participation and S&E interest.
Main Results:
- The most frequent positive reasons cited by students included learning new things, gaining research experience, finding the experience enjoyable/fun, and considering career choices.
- Common negative reasons involved the experience being not fun, stressful, or boring, having a poor project, lack of interest in science, or mandatory participation.
- Students receiving mentorship from scientists reported more positive comments and achieved better outcomes, whereas participation in school-only SEFs was associated with more negative feedback.
Conclusions:
- Student reasons for increased interest in S&E through SEFs align with mastery-oriented goals (learning and personal growth).
- Conversely, reasons for requiring competitive SEFs in prior studies align with performance-oriented goals (winning).
- Recognizing the interplay between mastery/performance orientations and self-determination theory (motivation, competence, community) can optimize SEF impact on STEM interest and career aspirations.
More Related Videos
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
10:17Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
Published on: November 15, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Ryan and Deci's Self-Determination Theory
Autonomy is the need to feel in control of one's actions and decisions. For example, a student who chooses their research topic is likely to be more engaged and motivated than one who...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Secondary Motives: Power Motivation and Achievement Motivation
Power motivation is characterized by the desire to influence, control, or have an impact on others. It is shaped by an individual's experiences, social environment, and cultural context. People with high power motivation are...
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Social Cognitive Perspective on Personality
