Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

What determines visual cue reliability?

Robert A. Jacobs¹

¹Dept of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and the Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, 14627, Rochester, NY, USA

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

|July 26, 2002

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Commentaries on Viewpoint: Principles, insights, and potential pitfalls of the noninvasive determination of muscle oxidative capacity by near-infrared spectroscopy.

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)·2018

Same author

A Bayesian Approach to Model Selection in Hierarchical Mixtures-of-Experts Architectures.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·1997

Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same journal

Timescapes of non-human experience.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

See all related articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Observers estimate cue reliability based on cue ambiguity and inter-cue correlations. Understanding cue reliability is crucial for visual cue combination and learning.

Area of Science:

Visual perception
Cognitive psychology
Information processing

Background:

Visual environments provide multiple cues about scene properties.
Efficient information integration requires assessing cue reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

To review hypotheses on how observers estimate cue reliabilities.
To examine the role of cue ambiguity and inter-cue correlations in reliability estimation.
To highlight the importance of cue reliabilities in visual cue combination and learning.

Main Methods:

Review of existing hypotheses on cue reliability estimation.
Theoretical analysis of cue ambiguity and inter-cue correlations.
Discussion of the implications for visual cue combination and learning.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

Two primary hypotheses for estimating cue reliability are discussed: cue ambiguity and inter-cue correlations.
Estimated cue reliability is influenced by both the inherent ambiguity of a cue and its relationship with other cues.
Cue reliabilities play a significant role in how visual information is combined and in visual learning processes.

Conclusions:

Observers estimate the reliability of visual cues based on their ambiguity and correlations with other cues.
Accurate estimation of cue reliability is fundamental for effective visual information processing.
This understanding has implications for visual cue combination strategies and visual learning mechanisms.