Patterns of covariation in the hominoid craniofacial skeleton: implications for paleoanthropological models

Living species are often used as analogues for fossil ones. When this is done, the implicit assumption is made that hominids and living hominoids vary in the same way. This paper addresses the validity of this assumption by comparing patterns of facial variation among humans and African apes. In particular, it addresses three major questions that underlie approaches to reconstructing hominid relationships. First, is phenotypic variation similar between closely related species? Second, if it is dissimilar, why? Third, is it feasible to use analogue species for modeling purposes? Measurements are obtained from 542 crania of adult apes and humans. Care is taken to choose homologous data, and account for differences in population size and structure. Variance/covariance and correlation matrices among the species are compared using common principal component (CPC) analysis, random skewers methods and matrix correlations. Morphological distances (D(2)) are calculated between population means, and between randomized pairs of individuals within each population, to evaluate intraspecific variation. Morphological distances are also calculated between randomized pairs of individuals using the variation patterns of analogue populations, in order to evaluate the efficacy of such substitutions. Results show that while the hominoids share a similar pattern of facial variation overall, the patterns do diverge. This difference generally corresponds to the phylogenetic relationships among these species, suggesting that patterns of variation may have diverged through time in the large bodied hominoids. Because interpretation of relationships in the fossil record is confounded by a lack of understanding of how variation changes through time, exploration of such patterns of divergence can provide important clues to understanding human evolution. Additionally, neglecting to account for this divergence when using living analogues as variation "yardsticks" can give rise to interpretations of the fossil record that are more speciose than is warranted.