Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Flap and interface complications in LASIK.

Michael C Knorz1

  • 1University of Heidelberg, Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Mannheim, Germany. knorz@eyes.de

Current Opinion in Ophthalmology
|August 8, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factors leading to realignment or exchange after implantable collamer lens implantation in 10 258 eyes.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2022
Same author

Visualization of Forward Light Scatter in Opacified Intraocular Lenses and Straylight Assessment.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same author

Corneal Incision Enlargement in Two Preloaded Intraocular Lens Injectors: An Intraindividual In Vivo Study.

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)·2021
Same author

June consultation #4.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2021
Same author

Trifocality Achieved Through Polypseudophakia: Optical Quality and Light Loss Compared With a Single Trifocal Intraocular Lens.

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)·2020
Same author

Comparison Between Bilateral Implantation of a Trifocal IOL and Mix-and-Match Implantation of a Bifocal IOL and an Extended Depth of Focus IOL.

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)·2020
Same journal

Laser vision correction (LASIK, PRK, SMILE) with simultaneous accelerated corneal crosslinking.

Current opinion in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Traumatic macular hole: observe, operate, or other options.

Current opinion in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

The evolving role of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: basic science, translation, and clinical integration.

Current opinion in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Editorial: reducing risk for refractive surgery.

Current opinion in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Updates on Refractive Surgery: Benefits, Risks, and Costs of Modern Treatment Options.

Current opinion in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Corneal Allogeneic Intrastromal Ring Segments for keratoconus - recent evidence and the move to customized and custom shaped CAIRS.

Current opinion in ophthalmology·2026
See all related articles

Modern microkeratomes significantly reduce flap complications in eye surgery compared to older models. These advancements improve patient safety by minimizing risks like flap slippage and interface issues.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Corneal Surgery
  • Laser Vision Correction

Background:

  • First-generation microkeratomes had a notable rate of flap complications (2.5%).
  • Modern microkeratomes have substantially decreased intraoperative complication rates.
  • Postoperative complications such as flap slippage and interface issues require careful monitoring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the incidence and types of flap and interface complications in corneal refractive surgery.
  • To compare complication rates between first-generation and modern microkeratomes.
  • To discuss the nature and management of interface complications like diffuse lamellar keratitis and epithelial ingrowth.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of complication data from studies utilizing Automated Corneal Shaper and Hansatome microkeratomes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of reported postoperative complications including flap slippage, diffuse lamellar keratitis, epithelial ingrowth, and interface fluid.
  • Categorization of complications based on timing (intraoperative vs. postoperative) and etiology.

    • Main Results:

    • Keratotomy-related complications decreased from 2.5% with older devices to 0.16% with modern microkeratomes.
    • Postoperative flap slippage occurred in 1.42% of cases, predominantly within the first hour after surgery.
    • Interface complications, including diffuse lamellar keratitis and epithelial ingrowth, represent new diagnostic considerations, with epithelial ingrowth linked to flap edge quality.

    Conclusions:

    • Modern microkeratome technology has dramatically improved safety by reducing flap complication rates.
    • Understanding and managing interface complications is crucial for optimal patient outcomes after corneal refractive surgery.
    • Attention to flap edge quality and apposition is vital for preventing complications like epithelial ingrowth.