Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is biology science?

Jack Cohen

    Biologist (London, England)
    |August 9, 2002
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Life sciences are often perceived as less rigorous, but this perspective is challenged. This work argues for the recognition of life sciences as legitimate hard science disciplines.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    First Case of Subretinal Ocular Angiostrongyliasis Associated with Retinal Detachment in the United States.

    Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare·2021
    Same author

    Feasibility of Proton Beam Therapy for Ocular Melanoma Using a Novel 3D Treatment Planning Technique.

    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2016
    Same author

    Mycobacterium leprae and Mycobacterium haemophilum co-infection in an iatrogenically immunosuppressed patient.

    Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease·2014
    Same author

    Candida antigen in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma.

    Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]·2005
    Same author

    Clinicopathologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular cytogenetic fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of primary and secondary cutaneous follicular lymphomas.

    The American journal of surgical pathology·2004
    Same journal

    Safe haven: REFUGEE BIOLOGISTS.

    Biologist (London, England)·2015
    Same journal

    Chronobiology and chronomics: detecting and applying the cycles of nature.

    Biologist (London, England)·2010
    Same journal

    Galls on thistles.

    Biologist (London, England)·2003
    Same journal

    Biogeography, a dirty word?

    Biologist (London, England)·2003
    Same journal

    Insect repellants in urban settings.

    Biologist (London, England)·2003
    Same journal

    Ripe for a change.

    Biologist (London, England)·2003
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Life Sciences
    • Scientific Methodology
    • Epistemology of Science

    Background:

    • The traditional view often separates 'hard' sciences (e.g., physics, chemistry) from 'soft' sciences.
    • Life sciences encompass a broad range of disciplines including biology, genetics, and biochemistry.
    • There is a prevailing misconception that life sciences lack the empirical rigor of other scientific fields.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To challenge the dichotomy between 'hard' and 'soft' sciences.
    • To advocate for the classification of life sciences as hard science.
    • To highlight the quantitative and predictive aspects of modern life sciences.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical analysis of scientific disciplines.
    • Examination of methodological standards in life sciences research.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of empirical evidence and theoretical frameworks across scientific fields.

    • Main Results:

    • Life sciences employ rigorous quantitative methods and mathematical modeling.
    • Predictive power and falsifiability are inherent in many life science theories.
    • The complexity of biological systems does not diminish their status as hard science.

    Conclusions:

    • Life sciences meet the criteria for hard science through empirical evidence and theoretical sophistication.
    • The perception of life sciences needs re-evaluation to reflect their scientific rigor.
    • Recognizing life sciences as hard science is crucial for interdisciplinary research and scientific progress.