Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating machine learning approaches for aiding probe selection for gene-expression arrays.

J B Tobler1, M N Molla, E F Nuwaysir

  • 1Department of Computer Science, University of Wisconsin, 1210 West Dayton Street, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|August 10, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An eye tracking study of bloodstain pattern analysts during pattern classification.

International journal of legal medicine·2017
Same author

ASAS centennial paper: Future needs in animal breeding and genetics.

Journal of animal science·2008
Same author

Biomedical informatics training at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Yearbook of medical informatics·2007
Same author

Regulation of animal biotechnology: research needs.

Theriogenology·2007
Same author

Identifying the future needs for long-term USDA efforts in agricultural animal genomics.

International journal of biological sciences·2007
Same author

Gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with chronic fatigue syndrome.

Journal of clinical pathology·2005
Same journal

Cross-Domain Transfer Learning from Peptides to Metabolites Using a Multi-Property Fine-Tuned LLM.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Biomedical Concept Recognition with Error-aware Negative-enhanced Ranking Framework.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

TEDLH: Domain HMMs for sensitive detection of remote homologues.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

PLNFGL: Joint Estimation of Multi-Condition Gene Networks from Single-cell RNA-seq Data.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

MCFST: Spatial domain identification method based on multi-view graph convolutional network and graph fusion network.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

SpaBiT: Enhancing Spatial Transcriptomics Resolution via Bidirectional Attention Transformers.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Machine learning algorithms, specifically naive Bayes and neural networks, can accurately predict DNA probe quality for gene expression microarrays. This improves probe selection, enabling more genes on each array.

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Microarrays enable simultaneous DNA hybridization experiments for gene expression analysis.
  • Selecting high-quality DNA probes is crucial but challenging due to probe performance variability.
  • Improved probe selection can increase gene density on microarrays.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate machine learning algorithms for predicting DNA probe quality.
  • To assess the efficacy of naive Bayes, decision trees, and artificial neural networks in this task.

Main Methods:

  • Empirical evaluation of three machine learning algorithms: naive Bayes, decision trees, and artificial neural networks.
  • Utilizing training data generated from actual hybridization experiments on gene chips.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employing easily computable features to represent DNA probes.

    • Main Results:

    • Naive Bayes and neural networks demonstrated strong performance in predicting probe quality.
    • These algorithms successfully identified top-ranking probes, with approximately five out of ten predictions falling within the top 2.5%.
    • Decision trees and melting temperature-based ranking performed significantly worse; probe sequence features, particularly cytosine fraction and central nucleotides, were most informative.

    Conclusions:

    • Machine learning, particularly naive Bayes and neural networks, offers a viable solution for accurate DNA probe quality prediction.
    • This approach can optimize microarray design by enabling more efficient probe selection.
    • The findings highlight the importance of specific sequence features in predicting probe hybridization performance.