Related Experiment Videos
Developments in the RICE asbestos fibre counting scheme, 1992-2000. Regular Interlaboratory Counting Exchanges
Patrick W Brown1, Alan D Jones, Brian G Miller
1Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK.
The Annals of Occupational Hygiene
|August 15, 2002
Summary
The Regular Interlaboratory Counting Exchanges (RICE) scheme improved asbestos fibre counting accuracy by changing reference values. New methods provide more reliable results for airborne fibre concentration measurements.
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health
- Environmental Science
- Analytical Chemistry
Background:
- The UK's Regular Interlaboratory Counting Exchanges (RICE) scheme is crucial for proficiency testing in asbestos fibre counting.
- Historically, RICE used industrial samples and automated image analysis for reference values.
- Changes in sample types and reference value determination were implemented in 1992.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the reliability of new reference values introduced in 1992 compared to older methods.
- To analyze trends in asbestos fibre counting levels based on sample density.
- To assess the impact of sample density range on laboratory counting accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of extensive data from 28 rounds of RICE sample exchanges.
- Comparison of reference values derived from automated image analysis versus laboratory medians.
- Examination of asbestos fibre counting trends across different sample densities (low and high).
Main Results:
- New reference values (medians of laboratory determinations) are more reliable than old ones (automated counts).
- Asbestos fibre counting levels stabilized in low-density samples after initial increases.
- High-density samples showed a consistent decrease in counting levels of approximately 0.5% per round.
Conclusions:
- The shift to median-based reference values and wider sample density range enhances the reliability of asbestos fibre quantification.
- Observed counting trends suggest reduced bias and better reflection of routine laboratory practices.
- Findings have implications for evolving asbestos counting rules and occupational exposure assessments.