Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical evaluation: constructing a new model for post-normal medicine.

Kieran Sweeney1, David Kernick

  • 1Research and Development Support Unit, Exeter, UK. k.g.sweeney@exeter.ac.uk

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
|August 16, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cardiometabolic multiple long-term conditions: a tractable focus for a field challenged by heterogeneity?

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Primary care and community interventions for multimorbidity involving depression or anxiety: systematic review with meta-analysis.

BMJ medicine·2026
Same author

Real-World Biomarker-Associated Therapy in Metastatic Carcinoma of Unknown Primary: Prevalence, Impact, and Outcomes.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN·2026
Same author

Authorship inflation in general practice research: unanswered questions to address?

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2026
Same author

SEZ6 expression and lineage plasticity in small cell lung cancer and transformed non-small cell lung cancer.

Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same author

Role of GP empathy on patient-reported outcomes in telephone consultations: a cross-sectional study with validation of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2025
Same journal

Evaluating Restraint and Seclusion as Care Processes Rather Than Compliance Metrics.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Burden in Informal Caregivers of Palliative Care Patients With Pressure Injuries: Perceived Social Support and Influencing Factors Care Burden in Palliative Caregivers.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Organisational Problems, Role Stress, and Job Satisfaction Among Emergency Department Workers: A Multicenter Mixed-Effects Study.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Highlighting a Systemic Bias in the Responder Odds Ratio.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

Epistemological Issues in Clinical Reasoning: A Scoping Review.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
Same journal

An Evaluation of AI-Generated Clinical Notes in the OpenNotes Era: A Thematic Analysis of Clinician Discourse.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2026
See all related articles

The current medical model, based on scientific positivism, has limitations. A new model using complexity theory offers a better approach for understanding medicine in its broader context.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Epistemology
  • Philosophy of Medicine
  • Systems Thinking in Healthcare

Background:

  • The dominant medical paradigm relies on scientific positivism.
  • This model exhibits weaknesses due to reductionism, linear thinking, and exclusion of human values.
  • These limitations necessitate a re-evaluation of medical knowledge acquisition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critique the inherent weaknesses of the positivist model in medicine.
  • To propose an alternative explanatory framework for medical knowledge.
  • To advocate for complexity theory as a foundation for post-normal medicine.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of existing medical explanatory models.
  • Argumentation for the adoption of complexity theory.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative evaluation of positivism versus complexity theory in a medical context.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified reductionism, linear thinking, and neglect of human values as key flaws in the positivist model.
    • Demonstrated that complexity theory better accommodates the interconnectedness and context of medical systems.
    • Highlighted the value of embracing a 'vaguely right' approach over 'precisely wrong' in complex medical scenarios.

    Conclusions:

    • The positivist model is insufficient for the complexities of modern medicine.
    • Complexity theory provides a more robust framework for understanding medical knowledge and practice.
    • Adopting complexity theory aligns with the needs of post-normal medicine, emphasizing holistic understanding and contextual relationships.