Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Point-of-care testing and recognizing and preventing errors.

Louise M Terry1

  • 1South Bank University, Essex Campus, Harold Wood Hospital, Harold Wood.

British Journal of Nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)
|August 16, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factors influencing nurses' engagement with CPD activities: a systematic review.

British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)·2021
Same author

A longitudinal, mixed methods investigation of newly qualified nurses' workplace stressors and stress experiences during transition.

Journal of advanced nursing·2017
Same author

The effect of fluency in English on the continuing professional development of nurses educated overseas.

Journal of continuing education in nursing·2013
Same author

Service user involvement in nurse education: a report on using online discussions with a service user to augment his digital story.

Nurse education today·2011
Same author

Dealing with death: first encounters for first-year nursing students.

British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)·2008
Same author

Protecting the interests of the child bone marrow donor.

Medicine and law·2005

A commercially available infectious mononucleosis test yielded false negatives, leading to incorrect amoxicillin prescriptions and adverse reactions. Subsequent laboratory tests confirmed the diagnosis, revealing a pattern of unreliable rapid testing in the GP surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical diagnostics
  • Infectious diseases
  • General practice

Background:

  • A patient presented with symptoms suggestive of infectious mononucleosis.
  • A rapid, commercially available diagnostic test was performed to exclude the diagnosis.
  • The patient was subsequently prescribed amoxicillin.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate a potential discrepancy between a rapid diagnostic test and laboratory confirmation for infectious mononucleosis.
  • To identify the reliability of a specific commercially available test in a general practice setting.

Main Methods:

  • A case report detailing a patient's diagnostic journey for infectious mononucleosis.
  • Comparison of results from a point-of-care rapid test versus central laboratory blood analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Anecdotal evidence collection from general practitioner colleagues regarding similar test discrepancies.

    • Main Results:

    • The rapid diagnostic test returned a false-negative result for infectious mononucleosis.
    • The patient developed a severe rash, a known complication of amoxicillin in patients with mononucleosis.
    • Confirmatory blood tests from a local pathology laboratory indicated a positive result for infectious mononucleosis.
    • Multiple similar cases were reported within the same GP surgery, suggesting a systemic issue with the rapid test's accuracy.

    Conclusions:

    • Commercially available rapid tests for infectious mononucleosis may exhibit significant false-negative rates.
    • Misdiagnosis due to unreliable rapid testing can lead to inappropriate treatment and adverse patient outcomes.
    • Further evaluation of rapid diagnostic test performance in primary care settings is warranted.