Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Feature frequency effects in recognition memory.

Kenneth J Malmberg1, Mark Steyvers, Joseph D Stephens

  • 1Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405, USA. malmberg@indiana.edu

Memory & Cognition
|August 20, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Human-AI collaboration: trade-offs between performance and preferences.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

The von Restorff effect in free recall, recognition, and source memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

How should the advancement of large language models affect the practice of science?

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Dialogues about the practice of science.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Modeling collaborative memory with SAM.

Memory & cognition·2024
Same author

The metacognition of vigilance: Using self-scheduled breaks to improve sustained attention.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2024
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Recognition memory is better for words with rare letters, challenging some theories of the word-frequency effect. Orthographic feature distinctiveness plays a role, but isn't the sole explanation.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • The word-frequency effect suggests rare words are better recognized than common words.
  • Theories propose rare words have more distinctive features, aiding recognition.
  • Orthographic features of words may influence recognition memory.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of orthographic feature distinctiveness in recognition memory.
  • To test if words composed of rare letters enhance recognition.
  • To determine if letter frequency independently affects recognition compared to word frequency.

Main Methods:

  • Recognition memory was assessed for words varying in orthographic feature commonness.
  • Words were categorized based on the frequency of their constituent letters (common vs. rare).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performance was measured using hit rates and false-alarm rates.

    • Main Results:

    • Recognition memory was superior for words constructed from rare letters.
    • A mirror effect was observed: rare-letter words had higher hit rates and lower false-alarm rates.
    • Normative word frequency influenced recognition independently of letter frequency.

    Conclusions:

    • The distinctiveness of orthographic features contributes to the word-frequency effect.
    • Letter frequency and normative word frequency independently impact recognition memory.
    • Explanations for the word-frequency effect must consider both word-level and feature-level characteristics.