Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Outcome and cue properties modulate blocking.

Jan De Houwer1, Tom Beckers, Steven Glautier

  • 1University of Southampton, UK. Jan.DeHouwer@rug.ac.be

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology
|August 22, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Erythritol, sucrose, and sucralose elicit similar reward responses after flavor preference learning in healthy humans.

Physiology & behavior·2026
Same author

Anxiety, Cognitive Biases, and Evaluative Conditioning: An Eye-Tracking Experiment.

International review of social psychology·2026
Same author

The impact of a loss of control over threat on stress reactivity.

Biological psychology·2026
Same author

Behavioral and Emotional Responding During Instrumental Learning in Children With ADHD: Reinforcement Schedule Effects.

Journal of attention disorders·2026
Same author

Assessing the Relational Abilities of Large Language Models and Large Reasoning Models.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

The HEXACO Adjective Scale: A Cross-Cultural Validity Study.

Journal of personality assessment·2025
Same journal

Relations between emotion, illusory word perception, and orthographic repetition blindness: tests of binding theory.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Causal and noncausal conditionals: an integrated model of interpretation and reasoning.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Phonological similarity effects in verbal complex span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

By which name should I call thee? The consequences of having multiple names.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
See all related articles

This study explored how people judge cue-outcome relationships. Findings show that how cues are described influences blocking effects in human contingency judgments.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Learning and Memory

Background:

  • Understanding human contingency judgments is crucial for explaining learning and decision-making.
  • Previous research has identified phenomena like blocking and overshadowing in associative learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of cue descriptions on blocking and overshadowing effects.
  • To test the predictions of probabilistic contrast models in human contingency judgments.

Main Methods:

  • Participants rated the likelihood of an outcome following various cues.
  • Experimental manipulations included compound cue training, elemental cue training, and cue descriptions (weapons vs. indicators).
  • Blocking and overshadowing effects were measured under different conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Cue descriptions significantly impacted the blocking effect; 'weapon' cues led to stronger blocking than 'indicator' cues.
  • The magnitude of the blocking effect was modulated by the extent of the outcome.
  • Cue instructions affected blocking but not overshadowing in a reduced overshadowing paradigm.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support probabilistic contrast models by demonstrating the flexibility of human contingency judgments.
  • Cue meaning and context play a significant role in associative learning and judgment formation.
  • This research offers new insights into the mechanisms underlying blocking and overshadowing.