Related Experiment Videos
Impact of differential item functioning on age and gender differences in functional disability
John A Fleishman1, William D Spector, Barbara M Altman
1Center for Cost and Financing Studies, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2101 East Jefferson Street, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. jfleishm@ahrq.gov
Summary
Differential item functioning (DIF) can bias estimates of disability. Adjusting for DIF revealed no significant age or gender differences in functional disability severity among adults.
Area of Science:
- Gerontology
- Sociology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Estimates of functional disability may be biased by differential item functioning (DIF).
- DIF occurs when individuals from different groups have varying probabilities of responding to an item, given their disability level.
- This bias can affect the accuracy of group comparisons in disability severity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of DIF on estimates of age and gender differences in functional disability severity.
- To determine the extent to which DIF influences perceived disability levels across different demographic groups.
- To assess the need for DIF adjustments in disability research.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the 1994/1995 National Health Interview Survey Disability Supplement.
- Analyzed 5,750 adult respondents with functional limitations in activities of daily living or instrumental activities of daily living.
- Employed multiple-indicator/multiple-cause models to estimate disability as a latent trait, examining age (18-39, 40-69, 70+) and gender groups.
Main Results:
- Nine survey items exhibited significant DIF by age or gender, particularly for "shopping" and "money management."
- Unadjusted analyses indicated lower disability in middle-aged adults compared to the elderly, and in women compared to men among non-elderly.
- After adjusting for DIF, these age and gender disparities in disability severity became non-significant.
Conclusions:
- Comparisons of functional disability across sociodemographic groups necessitate accounting for DIF.
- Future research should explore the underlying causes of DIF in disability measures.
- Developing alternative question wordings to minimize DIF is recommended for improved accuracy.