Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents
Published on: July 10, 2017
Allostatic load profiles, resilience, and psychosocial adaptation in young adults
Se Jun Koo1, Jung Woo Park1, Jee Eun Min1
1Section of Self, Affect and Neuroscience, Institute of Behavioural Science in Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Introduction:
Allostatic load (AL) reflects the cumulative physiological burden on the body, quantified using biomarkers across multiple systems. The current study identified latent AL profiles in young adults and examined whether resilience moderates associations between AL and depressive symptoms, social functioning, and role functioning.
Methods:
A total of 165 nonclinical young adults (84 women; aged 19-30 years) provided data on 15 biomarkers spanning the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, oxidative stress, inflammatory-immune, lipid/glucose-metabolic, and renal systems, which were z-standardized. Latent profile analysis was conducted using the mclust package in R. Moderated regression models examined depressive symptoms, social functioning, and role functioning as outcomes of AL profile, resilience, and their interaction, adjusting for age, sex, and cognitive ability. Percentile bootstrap confidence intervals were estimated (R = 5,000).
Results:
A two-profile solution was retained based on classification quality and interpretability, yielding control and higher-dysregulation profiles (n = 132 and n = 33, respectively; entropy = 0.965; average posterior probability = 0.993). The higher-dysregulation profile showed relatively elevated dysregulation, particularly in inflammatory-immune and lipid/glucose-metabolic markers. Resilience was inversely associated with depressive symptoms [b = -0.138, p < 0.001, 95% CI (-0.199, -0.079)], and a significant AL profile × resilience interaction [b = -0.335, p < 0.001, 95% CI (-0.645, -0.055)] indicated that this association was stronger in the higher-dysregulation group. A similar interaction was observed for social functioning (b = 0.038, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.003, 0.063]), whereas the interaction for role functioning was not significant.
Discussion:
These findings suggest that person-centered AL profiles capture heterogeneous physiological risk patterns. Resilience showed stronger associations with lower depressive symptoms and better social functioning among individuals with relatively greater physiological dysregulation, highlighting profile-dependent links between psychological resilience and psychosocial adaptation in young adulthood.
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to Stress and Lifestyle
Attachment Styles
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques II
Type A Personality: Driven and Easily Stressed
Individuals with Type A personalities are often highly competitive and ambitious and operate with a strong sense of urgency. Commonly labeled as "workaholics," they...
Erikson's Theory on Socioemotional Development during Adulthood
Intimacy Versus Isolation in Early Adulthood
Individuals in early adulthood, from the 20s...
Theory of Romantic Attachment in Adulthood
Longitudinal Research
