The oil crisis, risk and evidence-based practice.

Area of Science:

• Social Sciences
• Professional Studies
• Health Policy

Background:

• Evidence-based practice (EBP) has gained prominence globally over the past two decades.
• Its adoption varies across professions, presenting both opportunities and challenges to professional identity and development.
• EBP has faced controversy, with some criticisms lacking substantial grounding.

Purpose of the Study:

• To analyze the rise of EBP by examining its proponents and critics.
• To explore the underlying policy and sociological drivers influencing EBP adoption.
• To provide a framework for understanding EBP beyond simple advocacy or opposition.

Main Methods:

• A comprehensive review of existing literature on EBP.
• Analysis of arguments from proponents of EBP.
• Examination of criticisms from various professional groups.

Main Results:

• The rise of EBP can be linked to fiscal constraints, risk aversion, and professional responses to managerialism.
• Criticisms of EBP are not always convincing.
• Understanding the socio-political context is crucial for comprehending EBP's spread.

Conclusions:

• Advocating for or against EBP is less productive than understanding its emergence.
• The policy background and sociological reasons are key to grasping EBP's influence.
• A nuanced understanding of EBP's context is essential for professionals and policymakers.