Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2026
07:05
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
"Mindless" decision making as a failure of contextual reasoning
Matthew J Sharps1, Sandy S Martin
1Department of Psychology, California State University, Fresno 93740-8019, USA. matthew_sharps@csufresno.edu
The Journal of Psychology
|September 11, 2002
Summary
Making decisions mindlessly is common, even with available information. Presenting obvious, pertinent information during decision-making significantly improves understanding of consequences and reduces errors.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
- Decision Science
Background:
- Individuals frequently make decisions without considering crucial information, even when it is accessible.
- This tendency may stem from information not being readily available within the immediate decision-making context.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if presenting pertinent information in the decision context improves understanding of consequences.
- To explore methods for reducing 'mindless' decision-making.
Main Methods:
- Participants evaluated decision utilities under two conditions: with and without simple, pertinent information.
- The provided information was obvious and did not require prior training (e.g., opportunity costs).
Main Results:
- Presenting pertinent information in the immediate decision context significantly enhanced participants' ability to recognize negative consequences.
- Even readily available long-term memory information improved decision understanding when presented contextually.
Conclusions:
- Contextual presentation of pertinent information, even if commonly known, can improve decision-making comprehension.
- This strategy can effectively reduce 'mindless' decision-making by making relevant data immediately accessible.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:37Reason and Intuition
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
01:14Fundamental Attribution Error
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
01:09Decision Making: P-value Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
01:14Decision Making: Traditional Method
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
01:20Decision Making
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
01:24Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
A revisionist approach to Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has brought new insights that challenge and reinterpret his established ideas. Piaget proposed that the formal operational stage, emerging in adolescence, represents the culmination of cognitive maturity. During this stage, individuals are said to develop abstract thinking, engage in systematic problem-solving, and show a form of egocentrism, believing others are as preoccupied with their behavior as they are themselves.