Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Active versus passive processing of biological motion.

Ian M Thornton1, Ronald A Rensink, Maggie Shiffrar

  • 1Cambridge Basic Research, Nissan Research & Development Inc., MA 02142-1494, USA. ian.thornton@tuebingen.mpg.de

Perception
|September 11, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The bookend effect.

i-Perception·2026
Same author

The Mainz-Linez Illusion.

i-Perception·2025
Same author

Cross-Modal Cues Improve the Detection of Synchronized Targets during Human Foraging.

Multisensory research·2024
Same author

Partial object doubling in the periphery induced by negative afterimages.

i-Perception·2024
Same author

The inner tube effect.

i-Perception·2024
Same author

The effects of visual and auditory synchrony on human foraging.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2024
Same journal

Predictive models and parameter analysis for multiple tactile perceptions in skin-wet fabrics interface.

Perception·2026
Same journal

High-resolution kitsch by AI: Why society needs art, not more AI content.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perception·2026
See all related articles

Attention significantly impacts the perception of human motion from point-light displays. Top-down processing is attention-dependent, while bottom-up processing is not.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Johansson's point-light walker figures demonstrate motion's role in form perception.
  • Understanding the influence of attention on processing these stimuli is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of attention in processing point-light walker stimuli.
  • To differentiate between attention-dependent and attention-independent motion perception.

Main Methods:

  • A dual-task paradigm was employed to assess attention's influence.
  • Two experiments examined direction-discrimination performance in point-light walker displays.
  • Attention was divided to observe effects on performance.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performance in displays requiring top-down processing (temporal and spatial) was significantly impaired by divided attention.
  • Dividing attention had minimal impact on displays amenable to low-level, bottom-up computations.
  • Results align with the active/passive motion distinction.

Conclusions:

  • Attention plays a critical role in top-down processing of point-light walker stimuli.
  • Low-level, bottom-up processing of motion stimuli is less susceptible to attentional load.
  • The findings support the active/passive motion framework in visual perception.