Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Receptors: Internal Receptors01:07

Types of Receptors: Internal Receptors

31.6K
Many cellular signals are hydrophilic and cannot pass through the plasma membrane. However, small or hydrophobic signaling molecules can cross the hydrophobic core of the plasma membrane and bind intracellular receptors that reside within the cell cytoplasm or nucleus. Many mammalian steroid hormones and nitric oxide (NO) gas use this cell signaling mechanism.
Similar to membrane-bound receptors, the binding of a ligand to the intracellular receptor of causes a conformational change in the...
31.6K
Nuclear Localization Signals and Import01:46

Nuclear Localization Signals and Import

7.7K
Proteins targeted to the nucleus carry short stretches of amino acid sequences called the nuclear localization signal or NLS. Classical nuclear localization signals are of two types: monopartite and bipartite NLS. Monopartite classical NLS (cNLS) consists of a single cluster of 4-8 amino acids. Bipartite cNLS consists of two clusters of  2-3 amino acids and a 9-12 residue long proline-rich linker bridging the two clusters. Signal clusters are rich in positively charged amino acids such as...
7.7K
Types of Signaling Molecules01:32

Types of Signaling Molecules

12.8K
In multicellular organisms, many molecules transmit signals between cells to pass information. These signals vary in complexity and include small peptides, nucleotides, steroids, fatty acid derivatives, and dissolved gases such as nitric oxide. Some signaling molecules diffuse through the plasma membrane to act locally between neighboring cells or travel long distances. Others remain attached to the cell surface, transmitting information to other cells only when they make contact. In some...
12.8K
Types of Receptors: Cell Surface Receptors01:28

Types of Receptors: Cell Surface Receptors

26.8K
Cell-surface receptors, also known as transmembrane receptors, are cell surface, membrane-anchored (integral) proteins that bind to external ligand molecules. This type of receptor spans the plasma membrane and performs signal transduction, converting an extracellular signal into an intracellular signal. Ligands that interact with cell-surface receptors do not have to enter the cell that they affect. Cell-surface receptors are also called cell-specific proteins or markers because they are...
26.8K
Transducer Mechanism: Nuclear Receptors01:31

Transducer Mechanism: Nuclear Receptors

2.4K
Nuclear receptors, or NRs, are unique transcription factors that regulate gene transcription and affect the cellular pathways involved in reproduction, development, or metabolism. Their ability to be stimulated by small lipophilic ligands and control vital cellular processes makes them ideal drug targets. Nearly 10-15% of currently prescribed drugs target these receptors.
About 48 different soluble family members of nuclear receptors are identified that can be divided into two main classes:
2.4K
Atomic Nuclei: Types of Nuclear Relaxation01:28

Atomic Nuclei: Types of Nuclear Relaxation

937
Nuclear relaxation restores the equilibrium population imbalance and can occur via spin–lattice or spin–spin mechanisms, which are first-order exponential decay processes.
In spin–lattice or longitudinal relaxation, the excited spins exchange energy with the surrounding lattice as they return to the lower energy level. Among several mechanisms that contribute to spin–lattice relaxation, magnetic dipolar interactions are significant. Here, the excited nucleus transfers...
937

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of the vitamin D response index in a Saudi cohort.

Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society·2026
Same author

Temporal stratification of promoter-proximal versus enhancer VDR binding directs vitamin D-responsive transcription.

Epigenetics & chromatin·2026
Same author

Fanconi anaemia as a human model of accelerated epigenetic and immune ageing.

Ageing research reviews·2026
Same author

From Sunlight to Signaling: Evolutionary Integration of Vitamin D and Sterol Metabolism.

Metabolites·2026
Same author

Chromatin and transcriptional dynamics underlying the immune-modulatory effects of vitamin D<sub>3</sub> in vivo.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Text-to-music generation models capture musical semantic representations in the human brain.

Nature communications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 23, 2026

A Pipeline to Investigate the Structures and Signaling Pathways of Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptors
12:27

A Pipeline to Investigate the Structures and Signaling Pathways of Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptors

Published on: June 8, 2022

3.9K

Differential nuclear receptor signalling from DR4-type response elements.

Marcus Quack1, Christian Frank, Carsten Carlberg

  • 1Institute for Physiological Chemistry I, Heinrich-Heine-University, D-40001 Düsseldorf, Germany.

Journal of Cellular Biochemistry
|September 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Nuclear receptors like RXR, VDR, T3R, and LXR bind DNA response elements (REs). Specific flanking sequences on these REs significantly impact receptor complex formation and gene regulation, aiding in predicting hormone responsiveness.

More Related Videos

Measuring G-protein-coupled Receptor Signaling via Radio-labeled GTP Binding
10:13

Measuring G-protein-coupled Receptor Signaling via Radio-labeled GTP Binding

Published on: June 9, 2017

17.1K
Prediction and Validation of Gene Regulatory Elements Activated During Retinoic Acid Induced Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation
09:07

Prediction and Validation of Gene Regulatory Elements Activated During Retinoic Acid Induced Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation

Published on: June 21, 2016

8.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 23, 2026

A Pipeline to Investigate the Structures and Signaling Pathways of Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptors
12:27

A Pipeline to Investigate the Structures and Signaling Pathways of Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptors

Published on: June 8, 2022

3.9K
Measuring G-protein-coupled Receptor Signaling via Radio-labeled GTP Binding
10:13

Measuring G-protein-coupled Receptor Signaling via Radio-labeled GTP Binding

Published on: June 9, 2017

17.1K
Prediction and Validation of Gene Regulatory Elements Activated During Retinoic Acid Induced Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation
09:07

Prediction and Validation of Gene Regulatory Elements Activated During Retinoic Acid Induced Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation

Published on: June 21, 2016

8.6K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Endocrinology

Background:

  • Nuclear receptors are transcription factors that regulate gene expression in response to hormones.
  • Specific DNA sequences, known as response elements (REs), dictate which genes are targeted by nuclear receptors.
  • Understanding these interactions is crucial for deciphering gene regulation and predicting cellular responses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the functional similarity of retinoid X receptor (RXR) heterodimers with vitamin D3 receptor (VDR), thyroid hormone receptor (T3R), and liver X receptor (LXR).
  • To analyze the impact of flanking nucleotide sequences on DR4-type response elements on nuclear receptor complex formation and function.
  • To correlate in vitro binding preferences with in vivo cellular activity.

Main Methods:

  • Studied heterodimer complexes of RXR with VDR, T3R, and LXR on a DR4-type response element from the rat pit-1 gene.
  • Systematically altered flanking sequences of the DR4 element and assessed their effect on receptor complex formation in vitro.
  • Correlated in vitro binding data with functional assays in living cells to determine receptor activity.

Main Results:

  • Heterodimer complexes of RXR with VDR, T3R, and LXR showed comparable functionality on the DR4 response element.
  • Specific flanking sequences, both upstream and downstream of the binding motifs, had significant and receptor-specific effects on heterodimer complex formation.
  • Downstream GA substitutions reduced LXR complex formation, while upstream AA or TA substitutions enhanced LXR and T3R complex formation.
  • In vitro complex formation preferences correlated well with nuclear receptor activity in cells.

Conclusions:

  • Nuclear receptor binding to DNA response elements is highly sensitive to flanking sequences.
  • These findings provide a more detailed understanding of known REs and facilitate the search for novel REs in genomic sequences.
  • The results enable more precise predictions of gene hormone responsiveness.