Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Limitations in the cardiac risk reduction provided by coronary revascularization prior to elective vascular surgery
Martin R Back1, Norma Stordahl, David Cuthbertson
1Division of Vascular Surgery, University of South Florida College of Medicine, the Surgical Service, James A Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, FL, USA. mback@hsc.usf.edu
Insights
Previous coronary revascularization, such as coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), offers limited cardiac protection before major arterial surgery. De novo or recurrent coronary disease is a key predictor of adverse events.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Surgery
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Major arterial surgery carries significant cardiac risks.
- Previous coronary revascularization aims to mitigate these risks.
- The extent of protection offered by prior revascularization is not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cardiac protective effect of prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) before elective major arterial surgery.
Main Methods:
- Cardiac risk was stratified using ACC/AHA guidelines in 425 patients undergoing 481 vascular operations.
- Patients were categorized by prior revascularization status (recent, prior, remote) and compared for adverse cardiac events within 30 days.
- Logistic regression analysis identified predictors of cardiac events.
Main Results:
- Patients with prior revascularization had more cardiac risk factors.
- Recent revascularization (CABG <5 years, PTCA <2 years) showed lower adverse events (6.3%) and mortality (1.3%) compared to remote revascularization (10.4%, 6.3%) and high-risk non-revascularized patients (13.3%, 3.3%).
- De novo or recurrent coronary disease, not timing of revascularization, independently predicted events; remote revascularization predicted mortality.
Conclusions:
- Prior coronary revascularization (CABG <5 years, PTCA <2 years) provides only modest protection against adverse cardiac events and mortality after major arterial reconstruction.
- The presence of significant coronary artery disease is a stronger predictor of outcomes than the history or timing of revascularization.
Objective:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the proposed cardiac protective effect of previous coronary revascularization (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG] or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA]) before elective major arterial surgery.
Method:
Preoperative cardiac risk stratification using American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines was done on 425 consecutive patients undergoing 481 elective major vascular operations at an academic VA Medical Center. The algorithm assumed asymptomatic patients with prior coronary revascularization (CABG, <5 year; PTCA, <2 year) were low cardiac risk. Coronary angiography was done for recurrent symptoms with secondary intervention when appropriate. Outcomes (myocardial infarction, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, ventricular arrhythmia, cardiac death, and mortality) within 30 days of vascular surgery were compared between patients with and without previous CABG or PTCA by contingency table and logistic regression analyses.
Results:
Coronary revascularization was classified as recent (CABG, <1 year; PTCA, <6 months) in 35 cases (7%), prior (1 year < or = CABG < 5 year, 6 months < or = PTCA < 2 year) in 45 cases (9%), and remote (CABG, > or = 5 year; PTCA, > or = 2 year) in 48 cases (10%). A larger fraction of patients with previous revascularization possessed pathologic cardiac risk variables and were stratified as high-risk preoperatively than their nonrevascularized counterparts. Outcomes in patients with previous PTCA were similar to those after CABG (P =.7). Significant differences in adverse cardiac events (P =.01) and mortality (P =.05) were found between patients with CABG done within 5 years or PTCA within 2 years (6.3%, 1.3%, respectively), individuals with remote revascularization (10.4%, 6.3%), and nonrevascularized patients stratified at high risk (13.3%, 3.3%) or intermediate/low (2.8%, 0.9%) risk. De novo or recurrent 3-vessel coronary disease by angiography, but not the presence or timing of previous revascularization, was an independent predictor of cardiac events after vascular operations, whereas remote revascularization was associated with fatal outcomes by multivariate analysis.
Conclusions:
Previous coronary revascularization (CABG, <5 years; PTCA, <2 years) may provide only modest protection against adverse cardiac events and mortality following major arterial reconstruction.
More Related Videos
10:28Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
05:25Surgical Porcine Model of Chronic Myocardial Ischemia Treated by Exosome-laden Collagen Patch and Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
Published on: September 15, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management