Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of subjective and objective measures in recurrently wheezy infants

Johannes H Wildhaber1, Nigel D Dore, Sunalene G Devadason

  • 1Swiss Paediatric Respiratory Physiology Research Group, Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Children's Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland. johannes.wildhaber@kispi.unizh.ch

Insights

Objective lung function tests, specifically forced expiratory volumes (FEV(t)) using the raised volume rapid thoracic compression technique, correlate well with physician assessments in wheezy infants. This contrasts with maximal flow at functional residual capacity (VmaxFRC) measurements.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Pulmonology
  • Respiratory Physiology
  • Infant Health

Background:

  • Recurrently wheezy infants present diagnostic challenges.
  • Subjective health assessments may not fully capture objective lung function.
  • Objective lung function measurements are crucial for monitoring infant respiratory health.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare subjective health assessments with objective lung function measurements in wheezy infants.
  • To evaluate the utility of forced expiratory volumes (FEV(t)) and maximal flow at functional residual capacity (VmaxFRC) in this population.
  • To determine the correlation between physician and mother's overall health assessment and objective lung function data.

Main Methods:

  • Sixteen wheezy infants (8-26 months) were studied.
  • Lung function was assessed during acute exacerbations and asymptomatic periods using the raised volume rapid thoracic compression technique (RVRTC) for FEV(t) and tidal volume rapid thoracic compression technique (TVRTC) for VmaxFRC.
  • Subjective overall health assessments were obtained from the study physician and the infant's mother.

Main Results:

  • Mean FEV(t) (FEV(0.5) and FEV(0.75)) were significantly lower during exacerbations compared to asymptomatic periods.
  • Mean VmaxFRC did not show significant differences between exacerbation and asymptomatic periods.
  • FEV(t) measurements correlated well with the study physician's overall health assessment, but not with the mother's assessment.

Conclusions:

  • Objective FEV(t) measurements obtained via RVRTC correlate effectively with physician-based health assessments in infants.
  • VmaxFRC measurements in the tidal volume range showed less correlation with subjective health assessments.
  • The RVRTC technique is a feasible and reliable method for assessing and monitoring obstructive lung disease in infants.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos