A comparison of survival in extremely low birth weight infants between periods 1997-1998 and 1998-2000

Sheng-Shing Lin1, Bai-Horng Su, Tsung-Wen Lin

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, China Medical College Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.

Acta Paediatrica Taiwanica = Taiwan Er Ke Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi
|September 20, 2002
PubMed

Insights

Survival rates for extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants improved slightly between two study periods. Gestational age and birth weight remain key survival factors, highlighting the need for enhanced neonatal care and prevention of premature births.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatalogy
  • Perinatal Medicine
  • Pediatric Survival Rates

Background:

  • Extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants face significant mortality risks.
  • Understanding factors influencing survival is crucial for improving outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare survival rates and influential perinatal factors of ELBW infants between two distinct time periods.
  • To identify critical gestational age and birth weight thresholds for ELBW infant survival.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of ELBW infant data from two periods: January 1997-May 1998 and June 1998-December 2000.
  • Comparison of survival rates, gestational age, birth weight, and complications between the two periods.

Main Results:

  • Overall survival rate increased from 48.8% in Period 1 to 55.2% in Period 2.
  • Gestational age < 24 weeks and birth weight < 700 gm (Period 1) or < 500 gm (Period 2) were associated with significantly increased mortality.
  • Early neonatal mortality remained high, accounting for 50% of deaths, indicating a need for improved early neonatal care.

Conclusions:

  • While survival rates show a modest improvement, critical factors like gestational age and birth weight remain paramount.
  • Enhanced neonatal care, particularly in the first week of life, and prevention of extreme prematurity are essential for reducing ELBW infant mortality.
  • Active treatment plans for ELBW infants with gestational age ≥ 24 weeks or birth weight ≥ 500 gm are recommended.

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
Introduction To Survival Analysis01:18

Introduction To Survival Analysis

Survival analysis is a statistical method used to study time-to-event data, where the "event" might represent outcomes like death, disease relapse, system failure, or recovery. A unique feature of survival data is censoring, which occurs when the event of interest has not been observed for some individuals during the study period. This requires specialized techniques to handle incomplete data effectively.
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time until a...
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...