Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 6, 2026

Transcutaneous Microcirculatory Imaging in Preterm Neonates
Published on: December 31, 2015
A comparison of survival in extremely low birth weight infants between periods 1997-1998 and 1998-2000
Sheng-Shing Lin1, Bai-Horng Su, Tsung-Wen Lin
1Department of Pediatrics, China Medical College Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Insights
Survival rates for extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants improved slightly between two study periods. Gestational age and birth weight remain key survival factors, highlighting the need for enhanced neonatal care and prevention of premature births.
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Perinatal Medicine
- Pediatric Survival Rates
Background:
- Extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants face significant mortality risks.
- Understanding factors influencing survival is crucial for improving outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare survival rates and influential perinatal factors of ELBW infants between two distinct time periods.
- To identify critical gestational age and birth weight thresholds for ELBW infant survival.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of ELBW infant data from two periods: January 1997-May 1998 and June 1998-December 2000.
- Comparison of survival rates, gestational age, birth weight, and complications between the two periods.
Main Results:
- Overall survival rate increased from 48.8% in Period 1 to 55.2% in Period 2.
- Gestational age < 24 weeks and birth weight < 700 gm (Period 1) or < 500 gm (Period 2) were associated with significantly increased mortality.
- Early neonatal mortality remained high, accounting for 50% of deaths, indicating a need for improved early neonatal care.
Conclusions:
- While survival rates show a modest improvement, critical factors like gestational age and birth weight remain paramount.
- Enhanced neonatal care, particularly in the first week of life, and prevention of extreme prematurity are essential for reducing ELBW infant mortality.
- Active treatment plans for ELBW infants with gestational age ≥ 24 weeks or birth weight ≥ 500 gm are recommended.
Abstract:
The survival rates and the influential perinatal factors of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants were compared between two periods, including January 1997 through May 1998 (Period 1, n = 84) and June 1998 through December 2000 (Period 2, n = 145). The survival rate was 48.8% (41/84) during Period 1 and 55.2% (80/145) during Period 2. Gestational age (GA) and birth weight (BW) were the most important factors that influenced the survival rate. The cut off levels, below which mortality rates increased significantly, were GA < 24 weeks and BW < 700 gm during Period 1 and GA < 24 weeks and BW < 500 gm during Period 2. During Period 1, the smallest survival was a female infant with GA of 23 weeks and BW of 530 gm who had no complication and lived well. During Period 2, the smallest survival was a female infant with GA of 21 weeks and BW of 460 gm who was discharged with home oxygen therapy. She was admitted again via emergency due to sudden onset of apnea and cardiac arrest 4 days after discharge, and she died 4 days after the 2nd admission. Our results did not show any advantages to maternal transfer or delivery by Cesarean section. The early neonatal mortality rate was still high during Period 2 and accounted for 50% of the overall neonatal mortality rate. This implies that further training to improve the neonatal care, especially during the early stage of the first week should be reinforced to reduce neonatal deaths. Prevention of the births of extremely premature infants should be more emphasized to decrease neonatal mortality and morbidity rates. When the delivery of an ELBW infant is impending, an active plan of treatment for all infants of GA > or = 24 weeks or BW > or = 500 gm seems appropriate.
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Relative Risk
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time until a...
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

