Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial
K A A Fox1, P A Poole-Wilson, R A Henderson
1Cardiovascular Research, Department of Medical and Radiological Sciences, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh EH3 9YW, UK. k.a.a.fox@ed.ac.uk
Insights
An early interventional strategy for unstable coronary-artery disease significantly reduces refractory angina compared to a conservative approach. This approach is preferable, showing no increased risk of death or myocardial infarction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Acute Coronary Syndromes
Background:
- Current guidelines offer both interventional and conservative strategies for moderate-risk unstable coronary-artery disease.
- The optimal strategy for these patients remains a subject of investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of an early interventional strategy versus a conservative strategy in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.
Main Methods:
- A randomized multicenter trial involving 1810 patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.
- Patients were assigned to either an early intervention or a conservative strategy, both using enoxaparin.
- Co-primary endpoints included a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or refractory angina at 4 months, and death or myocardial infarction at 1 year.
Main Results:
- At 4 months, the intervention group showed a significantly lower rate of death, myocardial infarction, or refractory angina (9.6% vs. 14.5%, p=0.001).
- This difference was primarily driven by a reduction in refractory angina.
- At 1 year, the rates of death or myocardial infarction were similar between groups (7.6% vs. 8.3%, p=0.58).
- The interventional strategy led to improved angina symptoms and reduced antianginal medication use.
Conclusions:
- An early interventional strategy is preferable for patients with unstable coronary-artery disease.
- This preference is mainly due to a significant reduction in refractory or severe angina.
- The interventional strategy does not increase the risk of death or myocardial infarction.
Background:
Current guidelines suggest that, for patients at moderate risk of death from unstable coronary-artery disease, either an interventional strategy (angiography followed by revascularisation) or a conservative strategy (ischaemia-driven or symptom-driven angiography) is appropriate. We aimed to test the hypothesis that an interventional strategy is better than a conservative strategy in such patients.
Methods:
We did a randomised multicentre trial of 1810 patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (mean age 62 years, 38% women). Patients were assigned an early intervention or conservative strategy. The antithrombin agent in both groups was enoxaparin. The co-primary endpoints were a combined rate of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or refractory angina at 4 months; and a combined rate of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction at 1 year. Analysis was by intention to treat.
Findings:
At 4 months, 86 (9.6%) of 895 patients in the intervention group had died or had a myocardial infarction or refractory angina, compared with 133 (14.5%) of 915 patients in the conservative group (risk ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.85, p=0.001). This difference was mainly due to a halving of refractory angina in the intervention group. Death or myocardial infarction was similar in both treatment groups at 1 year (68 [7.6%] vs 76 [8.3%], respectively; risk ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.67-1.25, p=0.58). Symptoms of angina were improved and use of antianginal medications significantly reduced with the interventional strategy (p<0.0001).
Interpretation:
In patients presenting with unstable coronary-artery disease, an interventional strategy is preferable to a conservative strategy, mainly because of the halving of refractory or severe angina, and with no increased risk of death or myocardial infarction.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina II: Classification
Angina IV: Management
Angina V: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care


