Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Effects of census adjustment.

W P O'hare

    Population Today
    |March 1, 1989
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    KIDS COUNT: identifying and helping America's most vulnerable.

    Statistical bulletin (Metropolitan Life Insurance Company : 1984)·2000
    Same author

    Making kids count.

    Statistical bulletin (Metropolitan Life Insurance Company : 1984)·1998
    Same author

    Gonna get married: family formation in rural areas.

    Population today·1991
    Same author

    Hispanic Americans in the 1980s: mainstream or minority?

    Population today·1989
    Same author

    Black demographic trends in the 1980s.

    The Milbank quarterly·1987
    Same author

    Poverty in America: trends and new patterns.

    Population bulletin·1985
    Same journal

    John D. Rockefeller 3rd, statesman and founder of the Population Council.

    Population today·2002
    Same journal

    The urban demographic revolution.

    Population today·2002
    Same journal

    Housing discrimination 101.

    Population today·2002
    Same journal

    Building pyramids.

    Population today·2002
    Same journal

    Deconstructing population momentum.

    Population today·2002
    Same journal

    Spotlight: Azerbaijan.

    Population today·2002
    See all related articles

    This study analyzed how different adjustment methods affect Congressional seat apportionment after the 1990 Decennial Census. Results indicate these adjustments would not significantly alter Congress's overall composition.

    Area of Science:

    • Political Science
    • Demography
    • Statistics

    Background:

    • The U.S. Decennial Census is mandated to count the population every ten years.
    • Congressional apportionment, the process of dividing seats based on population, is a critical outcome of the census.
    • Historical census data and apportionment methods are subject to scrutiny and potential adjustments.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the impact of various proposed adjustment scenarios on Congressional seat apportionment.
    • To determine if alternative adjustment procedures could significantly change the composition of the U.S. Congress following the 1990 census.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of hypothetical adjustment scenarios applied to 1990 census data.
    • Comparative assessment of apportionment outcomes under different adjustment methodologies.
    Keywords:
    AmericasCensusCensus MethodsData AdjustmentDeveloped CountriesDeveloping CountriesError SourcesGovernmentMeasurementNorth AmericaNorthern AmericaPolitical FactorsPopulation StatisticsResearch MethodologyUndercountUnited States

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • None of the examined adjustment scenarios produced a significant shift in the distribution of Congressional seats.
    • The overall composition of Congress remained largely consistent across tested adjustment procedures.

    Conclusions:

    • The tested alternative adjustment procedures for the 1990 Decennial Census would not substantially alter Congressional apportionment.
    • The findings suggest a degree of stability in apportionment outcomes regardless of minor procedural adjustments.