Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Online patient information.

Amanda Oakley1

  • 1Department of Dermatology, Health Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery
|September 27, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Patients can easily find reliable skin disease information online, but must be cautious of inaccurate websites. Resources like Health on the Net offer guidance for evaluating online health content quality.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Response to "Response to: Urgency vs triage prioritisation: appropriateness of referrer-rated urgency of referrals to a public dermatology service".

The New Zealand medical journal·2025
Same author

The Utility of the SUNTRAC Tool in Predicting Skin Cancers in Renal Transplant Patients.

The Australasian journal of dermatology·2025
Same author

Urgency vs triage prioritisation: appropriateness of referrer-rated urgency of referrals to a public dermatology service.

The New Zealand medical journal·2025
Same author

A Retrospective Observational Study of the Incidence and Associated Risk Factors of Skin Cancers in Renal Transplant Recipients in Canterbury, New Zealand.

The Australasian journal of dermatology·2025
Same author

Health Equity and Secukinumab for Severe Psoriasis in New Zealand.

The Australasian journal of dermatology·2025
Same author

Pacific people living in New Zealand are most commonly referred with eczema to dermatologists.

The New Zealand medical journal·2024
Same journal

Systemic therapy for advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery·2019
Same journal

Atypical Fibroxanthoma.

Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery·2019
Same journal

Introduction, High-Risk Skin Cancer.

Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery·2019
Same journal

Emerging technologies for health information in dermatology: opportunities and drawbacks of web-based searches, social media, mobile applications, and direct-to-consumer genetic testing in patient care.

Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery·2019
Same journal

MoleMapper: an application for crowdsourcing mole images to advance melanoma early-detection research.

Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery·2019
Same journal

Digital imaging applications and informatics in dermatology.

Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery·2019
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Health Informatics
  • Medical Communication

Background:

  • The internet provides abundant resources for patients with skin diseases.
  • Patients seek information on diseases, dermatologists, skincare products, and support organizations.
  • Authoritative content originates from academic dermatology associations and institutions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the landscape of online dermatological information available to patients.
  • To identify the types of information and interactive features patients seek online.
  • To highlight the challenges posed by unmoderated and potentially fraudulent health websites.

Main Methods:

  • Review of internet resources for dermatological information.
  • Categorization of information sources (e.g., academic, commercial, portals).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of interactive features (e.g., forums, chat).
  • Main Results:

    • Extensive disease-related information is accessible.
    • Patients also search for dermatologists, products, and support.
    • Authoritative content is distributed through various online channels.
    • Interactive features like forums and live chat are available.
    • The internet's unmoderated nature presents risks of misinformation and exploitation.

    Conclusions:

    • While excellent dermatological information exists online, patients need to critically evaluate sources.
    • Organizations like Health on the Net provide ethical principles to help consumers assess information quality.
    • Navigating online health information requires user discernment to avoid misleading or fraudulent content.