Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Informed consent: recent changes in the law.

Transactions of the American Association of Genito-Urinary Surgeons

|January 1, 1975

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Physicians must legally disclose procedure risks, empowering patients to make informed treatment choices. This shift prioritizes patient autonomy over professional judgment, reflecting evolving legal standards in healthcare.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Forensic urology: a practical vision.

Medicine and law·1998

Same author

Formative years of the Urodynamics Society: reminiscences.

Neurourology and urodynamics·1998

Same author

Testicular torsion: pitfalls of color Doppler sonography.

The Journal of urology·1993

Same author

Thanatology: a new clinical specialty to help confront death.

Missouri medicine·1992

Same author

"Let's kill all the lawyers": what did Shakespeare mean?

The Journal of legal medicine·1991

Same author

Medicolegal aspects of testicular torsion.

Missouri medicine·1990

Same journal

Diverticulum of the female urethra.

Transactions of the American Association of Genito-Urinary Surgeons·2010

Same journal

The use of dicoumarol and vitamin K in urological cases.

Transactions of the American Association of Genito-Urinary Surgeons·2010

Same journal

The problem of acidosis in urological patients.

Transactions of the American Association of Genito-Urinary Surgeons·2010

Same journal

Cortical infections of polycystic kidneys.

Transactions of the American Association of Genito-Urinary Surgeons·2010

Same journal

Osteonephropathy; a report of two cases.

Transactions of the American Association of Genito-Urinary Surgeons·2010

Same journal

Leiomyoma of the kidney associated with hemorrhagic cyst.

Transactions of the American Association of Genito-Urinary Surgeons·2010

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Medical Law
Bioethics
Patient Rights

Background:

Physicians traditionally held significant authority in treatment decisions.
Evolving legal doctrines now emphasize patient autonomy and informed consent.
Previous legal standards often prioritized physician expertise over patient preference.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze the legal duty of physicians regarding risk disclosure for medical procedures.
To examine the shift in legal doctrine towards patient-centered decision-making.
To highlight the significance of informed consent in modern medical practice.

Main Methods:

Review of legal precedents and case law concerning physician disclosure duties.
Analysis of judicial decisions that have shaped informed consent doctrine.

Related Experiment Videos

Examination of the legal standards for adequate disclosure in medical procedures.

Main Results:

Physicians have a legal obligation to disclose all risks and consequences of proposed procedures.
Adequate disclosure is defined by the patient's understanding and ability to choose among options.
The criterion for sufficiency is the relevance of information, not its exhaustive completeness.
Several states have rejected the 'doctor knows best' standard, favoring patient autonomy.

Conclusions:

The doctrine of informed consent represents a significant social and legal change in healthcare.
Patient autonomy and informed decision-making are increasingly central to medical ethics and law.
The trend towards greater patient empowerment in treatment choices is expected to continue in legal frameworks.